Denver, sorry. I didn't understand what you meant about the size of the attachment... I thought you were asking a lesser size of the attachment 'cause you couldn't download it or something...
BUT... Besides you being rude and responding VERY unpolitely to my well-intended reply... I'm so sorry to tell you that I cannot fulfill your request of stop sending attchs. I know a way for you to stop receiving attachs, but you won't receive ANY attachment from this ng... :) Rodolfo. "Bill McCormick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > So after stating you don't claim to own the newsgroup you go on again to > state your personal beliefs as to how it is / should work. > > No one to my knowledge makes attachments explicitly for you. They post > documents to share on the newsgroup. Every time someone does you > complain about it. I am asking you to stop. It is not against the rules. > Is this clear? > > > Denver Braughler wrote: > > Bill McCormick wrote: > > > >>you do not own the newsgroup. > > > > I never claimed to. > > > > > >>There are some people who cannot > >>provide the sorts of links you are referring to. > > > > What I was hoping to do was make myself clear enough that people wouldn't make such attachments for me. > > I don't want unsolicited attachments. > > But the person to whom I replied post an 50K attachment for me that I didn't even want. > > Seeing that too much was being lost I the translation, I tried to make myself abundantly clear. > > Apparently it was pretty unambiguous. > > I hope it translated okay. > > > > > >>You should be able to configure your client not > >>to automatically download them I would imagine. > > > > We can all dream. > > But there is no way. > > > > > >>if we did not want to allow attachments we would > >>explicitly turn them off. > > > > My wish indeed. > > > -- > Bill McCormick > Web/Objects Support Manager > InterSystems Corporation > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
