John A Bertoglio wrote: > My information may be incorrect. That's what I said.
> You may disagree with me. On some things. > It is not a lie. No one suggested that it was, and certainly not that you knew it to be. But you excluded CSP from the scope of serious development. > I would suggest that running the task manager is a fairly sophisticated > need... ?? A default downloadable installation needs task manager just for housekeeping. > CSP is a nightmare with anything but an unlimited license. We do agree on this, I find it worth emphasizing. ISC has really missed the boat on this as we say in America. Most Americans got here by (someone) catching a boat. > I am fairly certain that the first proposal would not be acceptable. > But we would get it right, eventually. I'm still waiting.
