Doug Not sure. Declare the autonumber equivalent property in Cach� as a private and see if this helps.
Regards Sukesh Hoogan Doug Pickering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Hi Sukesh, > > I am certain you are right, the instance ID field would be a perfect > replacement. > > I don't have the luxury of creating an application from scratch, but I am > instead moving the backend Access database to cache so I can start further > development, whilst letting the existing Access front-end users continue as > before. As a result I need to keep the same field names, values and > behaviour until I eventually replace all the Access front end functionality > with Cache. > > Thank you for your reply. > > Best regards, > > Doug Pickering > > > > "Sukesh Hoogan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Doug > > > > Haven't looked at MS Access for years. > > > > AFAIK and remember, Access' Autonumber field can be equivalent to Cach� > > Class instance's ID, which cannot be changed or fiddled with by the user. > > So there may not be need to take preventive measures. > > > > Perhaps Peter Cooper can enlighten us on this. > > > > HTH > > > > Regards > > Sukesh Hoogan > > > >
