Peter Cooper wrote:
> Well what more can ISC do to develop CSP - HTML is a very simple
> concept and I think they have gone as far as they can 
For one thing, they could upgrade to strict XHTML.

> What I need/want is a "well defined" client that I can control from
> the server - SVG/XForms/HTML all fall into this category
Yes, I agree.
Browsers were originally page viewers.
Do you anticipate using the new XMLHTTP hyperevents?

> you have to distinguish between CSP (tag based 
> development) and the widgets (csp:bind etc).
I agree.
No matter what you call them, pages generated by a Cache' server are not 
coming to an end anytime soon.

Reply via email to