Peter Cooper wrote:

>I think we are sort of agreeing - or at least it's horses for courses
>and you choose the best thingy to meet the requirements

Agreed.

>my app is secure so they have to log on and then all the pages are
>(PRIVATE=1, ENCODED=1) plus they have to be logged on

Right, that's a good point - I've never used private/encoded pages, so
I wasn't aware that they would interfere with automatically
re-creating the session.

>it's not what the user wants - having to log on and navigate to the
>required page on every session timeout due to inactivity

Obviously, although navigating to the page they originally requested
after re-login can be done automatically. If the only way to avoid the
re-login is a long session timeout, then that's what you need to do.
This again calls for a looser coupling between sessions and licenses,
*especially* on (named) user licenses. I know this is probably not
going to happen, but it would be nice if someone from ISC was reading
this and could respond from their side -- AFAICS a looser coupling
would present no significant licensing issues (at least, none that
can't be worked-around already), but I could be mistaken.

>And as I said ISC did me a deal on a "spare" license to get them over
>the problem of not being able to get past the logon-screen

That is nice of them, but unless they volunteer this extra license to
everyone developing CSP apps, it is hardly a solution.

Gertjan.

-- 
Gertjan Klein

Reply via email to