Kevin, Those mapping options are not available on Cache. There are times I miss then terribly, but I have learned to live without them. It was particularly handy for keeping locally modified routines in a separate dataset from the 'standard' routines. It looked in the 'local' dataset for the routine, if it wasn't there it automatically looked in the 'standard' dataset.
I don't know of any way to 'automatically' do what he is describing, but he might find that ECP will provide the performance he wants , even though the data will all be kept in one place. Mark "kevin furze" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > In the old days of DTM and so on, you could map data(master) to Machine > A and Machine B and Machine C and then on the different machines map > data(machineA) to Master and data(machineB) to Master and > > this way, data was available locally > > not sure you can still do this, I assume you can > > kev >
