http://www.crisisgroup.org/en/regions/asia/south-east-asia/indonesia/b139-indonesia-tensions-over-acehs-flag.aspx

Indonesia: Tensions Over Aceh’s Flag
Asia Briefing N°139 7 May 2013 

OVERVIEW

The decision of the Aceh provincial government to adopt the banner of the 
former rebel Free Aceh Movement (Gerakan Aceh Merdeka, GAM) as its official 
provincial flag is testing the limits of autonomy, irritating Jakarta, 
heightening ethnic and political tensions, reviving a campaign for the division 
of Aceh and raising fears of violence as a national election approaches in 
2014. 

On 25 March 2013, the provincial legislature adopted a regulation (qanun) 
making the GAM’s old banner the provincial flag. It was immediately signed by 
Governor Zaini Abdullah. The governor and deputy governor are members of Partai 
Aceh, the political party set up by former rebel leaders in 2008 that also 
controls the legislature.

The central government, seeing the flag as a separatist symbol and thus in 
violation of national law, immediately raised objections and asked for changes. 
Partai Aceh leaders, seeing the flag as a potent tool for mass mobilisation in 
2014, have refused, arguing that it cannot be a separatist symbol if GAM 
explicitly recognised Indonesian sovereignty as part of the Helsinki peace 
agreement in 2005 that ended a nearly 30-year insurgency. Partai Aceh believes 
that if it remains firm, Jakarta will eventually concede, as it did in 2012 
over an election dispute. 

Indonesian President Yudhoyono’s government is torn. On the one hand, it does 
not want a fight with the GAM leaders; the 2005 peace agreement is the most 
important achievement of a president who, in his final term, is very much 
concerned about his legacy. It also is unwilling to provoke GAM too far, 
fearful that it will return to conflict, a fear many in Aceh discount as 
unwarranted but one that Partai Aceh has exploited with relish. On the other 
hand, it does not want to be branded as anti-nationalist as the 2014 election 
looms, especially as some in the security forces remain convinced that GAM has 
not given up the goal of independence and is using democratic means to pursue 
it. The president and his advisers also know that if they allow the GAM flag to 
fly, it will have repercussions in Papua, where dozens of pro-independence 
activists remain jailed for flying the “Morning Star” flag of the independence 
movement.

GAM leaders see little to lose by standing their ground. The flag is a hugely 
emotive symbol, and defying Jakarta is generally a winning stance locally. Some 
individual members of parliament see it as a way of regaining waning popularity 
for failing to deliver anything substantive to their constituencies. Also, 
Partai Aceh took a controversial decision to partner with Gerindra, the party 
of former army General Pra­bo­wo Subianto, for the 2014 election. Leaders like 
Muzakir Manaf, deputy governor and former commander of GAM’s armed wing, may 
want to use the flag issue to show they have not compromised their principles 
by allying with a man whose human rights record is often questioned. 

Within Aceh, adoption of the GAM flag has sparked protests from non-Acehnese 
ethnic groups in the central highlands and south west. The GAM heartland has 
always been along the east coast; to highlanders like the Gayo, the flag thus 
represents the domination of the coastal Acehnese at their expense. The issue 
has revived a dor­mant campaign for the division of Aceh into three by the 
creation of two new provinces, Aceh Leuser Antara (ALA) for the central 
highlands and Aceh Barat Selatan (ABAS) for the south west. If GAM does not 
back down on the flag, support for that campaign by the intelligence services 
is likely to rise, and with it, the probability of increased ethnic tensions. 

The options for breaking the stalemate seem to be as follows: the government 
concedes; GAM concedes, making slight changes to the flag by adding or removing 
an element; GAM agrees to limits on how or where the flag can be displayed; or 
the dispute is taken to the Supreme Court, thereby delaying any resolution.

In the meantime, the power of the GAM machinery in Aceh continues to grow.

Jakarta/Brussels, 7 May 2013



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Kirim email ke