This has not yet been implemented. You don't need a timer I believe as the OC modules have dedicated timers and in PWM mode will have shadow registers for updating the duration with no jitter. 500us is plenty of time at 16MHz if you use a high interrupt priority. On Jan 23, 2014 12:02 AM, "GoatZilla" <[email protected]> wrote:
> I noticed there was an earlier thread about PPM output being a > possibility, but I don't see it being implemented yet. Am I reading that > right? > > It does look like it's possible to do with the hardware compare (is Timer2 > still free?), as long as the interrupts get serviced within the shortest > pulse timing... Which is a ~500uS pulse with 500uS until next pulse. > > That sounds kind of tight with the way the double comparator only > interrupts on the falling edge, so maybe two single comparators -- one for > all the rising toggles, and one for all the falling toggles? Or perhaps > more? > > > > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "ioio-users" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/ioio-users. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ioio-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/ioio-users. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
