Hi Emil,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Emil Medve [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2015 8:05 PM
> To: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> Sethi Varun-B16395
> Cc: Medve Emilian-EMMEDVE1
> Subject: [PATCH 11/26] iommu/fsl: Fix checkpatch type OOM_MESSAGE
> 
> WARNING:OOM_MESSAGE: Possible unnecessary 'out of memory' message
> +       if (!data) {
> +               dev_err(&pdev->dev, "PAMU isr data memory allocation
> + failed\n");
> 
> Signed-off-by: Emil Medve <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/iommu/fsl_pamu.c | 1 -
>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/fsl_pamu.c b/drivers/iommu/fsl_pamu.c index
> 4f1926b..6f9c976 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/fsl_pamu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/fsl_pamu.c
> @@ -1041,7 +1041,6 @@ static int __init fsl_pamu_probe(struct
> platform_device *pdev)
> 
>       data = kzalloc(sizeof(*data), GFP_KERNEL);
>       if (!data) {
> -             dev_err(&pdev->dev, "PAMU isr data memory allocation
> failed\n");
>               ret = -ENOMEM;
>               goto error;
>       }
I think this is fine, there are other places as well where we have error prints 
while setting the ENOMEM as the return code.

-Varun

_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

Reply via email to