Hi Rob, >> btw, the current state, at least on linaro integration branch, fault >> handling doesn't work so well (ie. device never gets resumed).. which >> is a bit unfortunate for a gpu (and results in a *lot* of rebooting on >> my part when debugging userspace). I haven't had time yet to compare >> to the ancient downstream driver, but not sure if you have any ideas? >> >> I guess probably disabling stall on fault would help. But I'm not >> even getting the "Fault occurred in context.." prints. Seeing the >> fault iova is pretty useful since that plus gpu cmdstream trace helps >> me figure out which texture/etc is being accessed out of bounds. > >fyi, it looks like it is not getting any fault irq.. it's *possible* >that I screwed up the irq #'s when translating from downstream, so you >might want to double check that. I thought I had it right, I assume I >would have noticed during piglit runs if fault recovery wasn't working >(since the result is that *everything* after the faulting test would >have failed since gpu is wedged with no access to memory), but it was >long enough ago that I can't claim that definitively. > >If you need an easy way to trigger a gpu fault, msmtest is a good way, >change this line: > > https://github.com/freedreno/msmtest/blob/master/msmtest.c#L247 > >from OUT_RELOC() to OUT_RING(ring, 0x00000000) will trigger a fault. > So for the irq to be triggered, 'non-secure' irq line has to be populated in DT. There is a 'secure'and 'non-secure' irq lines for these iommus and non-secure irq number is secure + 1. I tested this by having a 'return 0' from the msm_iommu_map (no mapping), and the faults were getting triggered.
Can you share me your dts data ? Regards, Sricharan _______________________________________________ iommu mailing list iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
