On Tue, 2017-11-28 at 00:02 +0000, Mehta, Sohil wrote: > On Mon, 2017-11-27 at 20:52 +0000, Kammela, Gayatri wrote: > > > > > > > > From: Andy Shevchenko [mailto:andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com] > > > Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2017 1:19 PM > > > > > > Moreover, see the patch I have just sent [1] and use same > > > DEFINE_SHOW_ATTRIBUTE() macro here. In that case we would easily > > > move it > > > to seq_file.h for everyone to use in the future. > > > > That makes sense! I see your patch is not merged yet, so really > > cannot reuse the same macro. I will have to redefine it. > > Thanks Andy. That's a good suggestion. Are you planning to move the > macro to seq_file.h soon? If so, should we include this marco in our > patch after it has been merged?
Yes, I sent v2 [1] where it's moved to seq_file.h and asked Bluetooth maintainer to create an immutable branch for other subsystems. So far the response is to roll back to v1 AFAIU. [1]: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/cover/840899/ -- Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com> Intel Finland Oy _______________________________________________ iommu mailing list iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
