On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 03:47:39PM +0100, Tom Murphy wrote: > >And I'd really like to understand the unlikely - amd_iommu_np_cache > >is set based on a hardware capability, so it seems rather odd to mark > >it unlikely. Dynamic branch prediction really should do the right thing > >here usually. > > Here is the commit which added it without any explanation: > https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/270cab2426cdc6307725e4f1f46ecf8ab8e69193 > > should we remove it seen as there's no explanation given ?
I'd be tempted to do that. But lets just ask Joerg if he has any opinion.. _______________________________________________ iommu mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
