On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 4:55 PM Joerg Roedel <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 07:58:19AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > I'd be tempted to do that. But lets just ask Joerg if he has > > any opinion.. > > The reason was that it is an unlikely path, as hardware implementations > are not allowed to set this bit. It is purely for emulated AMD IOMMUs. > I have not measured whether this annotation has any performance > benefit, but I find it more readable at least.
In that case I will keep it in. > > Regards, > > Joerg > > PS: Why did you drop me from the Cc list of the previous replies? _______________________________________________ iommu mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
