On Mon,  3 Jun 2019 15:57:45 +0100
Jean-Philippe Brucker <[email protected]> wrote:

> Allow device drivers and VFIO to get notified on IOMMU translation
> fault, and handle recoverable faults (PCI PRI). Several series require
> this API (Intel VT-d and Arm SMMUv3 nested support, as well as the
> generic host SVA implementation).
> 
> Changes since v1 [1]:
> * Allocate iommu_param earlier, in iommu_probe_device().
> * Pass struct iommu_fault to fault handlers, instead of the
>   iommu_fault_event wrapper.
> * Removed unused iommu_fault_event::iommu_private.
> * Removed unnecessary iommu_page_response::addr.
> * Added iommu_page_response::version, which would allow to introduce a
>   new incompatible iommu_page_response structure (as opposed to just
>   adding a flag + field).
> 
> [1] [PATCH 0/4] iommu: Add device fault reporting API
>     
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
> 
> Jacob Pan (3):
>   driver core: Add per device iommu param
>   iommu: Introduce device fault data
>   iommu: Introduce device fault report API
> 
> Jean-Philippe Brucker (1):
>   iommu: Add recoverable fault reporting
> 
This interface meet the need for vt-d, just one more comment on 2/4. Do
you want to add Co-developed-by you for the three patches from me?

Thanks,

Jacob

>  drivers/iommu/iommu.c      | 236
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- include/linux/device.h     |
> 3 + include/linux/iommu.h      |  87 ++++++++++++++
>  include/uapi/linux/iommu.h | 153 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  4 files changed, 476 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 include/uapi/linux/iommu.h
> 

_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

Reply via email to