On Wed, 1 Apr 2020 09:32:37 +0200
Auger Eric <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> devtlb
> >> descriptor, that is why Eric suggests {0, 0, 1}.
> >
> > I think it should be {0, 0, 1} :-) addr field and S field are must,
> > pasid field depends on G bit.
>
> On my side, I understood from the spec that addr/S are always used
> whatever the granularity, hence the above suggestion.
>
> As a comparison, for PASID based IOTLB invalidation, it is clearly
> stated that if G matches PASID selective invalidation, address field
> is ignored. This is not written that way for PASID-based device TLB
> inv.
> >
I misread the S bit. It all makes sense now. Thanks for the proposal
and explanation.
Jacob
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
