Hi Chao,

On Thu, 2020-06-18 at 19:49 +0800, chao hao wrote:

> On Wed, 2020-06-17 at 11:34 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote:


[snip]


> > >  
> > >  #define REG_MMU_MISC_CTRL                        0x048
> > > +#define F_MMU_IN_ORDER_WR_EN                     (BIT(1) | BIT(17))
> > > +#define F_MMU_STANDARD_AXI_MODE_BIT              (BIT(3) | BIT(19))
> > > +
> > >  #define REG_MMU_DCM_DIS                          0x050
> > >  
> > >  #define REG_MMU_CTRL_REG                 0x110
> > > @@ -578,6 +581,14 @@ static int mtk_iommu_hw_init(const struct 
> > > mtk_iommu_data *data)
> > >           writel_relaxed(0, data->base + REG_MMU_MISC_CTRL);
> > >   }
> > >  
> > > + if (data->plat_data->has_misc_ctrl) {
> > 
> > That's confusing. We renamed the register to misc_ctrl, but it's present in 
> > all
> > SoCs. We should find a better name for this flag to describe what the 
> > hardware
> > supports.
> > 
> 
> ok, thanks for you advice, I will rename it in next version.
> ex:has_perf_req(has performance requirement)
> 
> 
> > Regards,
> > Matthias
> > 
> > > +         /* For mm_iommu, it can improve performance by the setting */
> > > +         regval = readl_relaxed(data->base + REG_MMU_MISC_CTRL);
> > > +         regval &= ~F_MMU_STANDARD_AXI_MODE_BIT;
> > > +         regval &= ~F_MMU_IN_ORDER_WR_EN;


Note: mt2712 also is MISC_CTRL register, but it don't use this in_order
setting.

As commented in v3. 0x48 is either STANDARD_AXI_MODE or MISC_CTRL
register. No need two flags(reset_axi/has_xx) for it.

something like:

regval = readl_relaxed(data->base + REG_MMU_MISC_CTRL);
if (reset_axi) {
        regval = 0;
} else {   /* MISC_CTRL */
        if (!apu[1])
                regval &= ~F_MMU_STANDARD_AXI_MODE_BIT;
        if (out_order_en)
                regval &= ~F_MMU_IN_ORDER_WR_EN;
}
writel_relaxed(regval, data->base + REG_MMU_MISC_CTRL);


[1] Your current patch doesn't support apu-iommu, thus, add it when
necessary.


> > > +         writel_relaxed(regval, data->base + REG_MMU_MISC_CTRL);
> > > + }
> > > +
> > >   if (devm_request_irq(data->dev, data->irq, mtk_iommu_isr, 0,
> > >                        dev_name(data->dev), (void *)data)) {
> > >           writel_relaxed(0, data->base + REG_MMU_PT_BASE_ADDR);
> > > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.h b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.h
> > > index 1b6ea839b92c..d711ac630037 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.h
> > > @@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ struct mtk_iommu_plat_data {
> > >  
> > >   /* HW will use the EMI clock if there isn't the "bclk". */
> > >   bool                has_bclk;
> > > + bool                has_misc_ctrl;
> > >   bool                has_vld_pa_rng;
> > >   bool                reset_axi;
> > >   unsigned char       larbid_remap[MTK_LARB_NR_MAX];
> > > 
> 
> 


_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

Reply via email to