Hi Vivek,
> From: Vivek Gautam <vivek.gau...@arm.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2021 7:06 PM
>
> Hi Yi,
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 2:51 PM Liu, Yi L <yi.l....@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Vivek,
> >
> > > From: Vivek Gautam <vivek.gau...@arm.com>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2021 2:50 PM
> > >
> > > Hi Yi,
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 4:13 PM Liu Yi L <yi.l....@intel.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > This patch is added as instead of returning a boolean for
> > > DOMAIN_ATTR_NESTING,
> > > > iommu_domain_get_attr() should return an iommu_nesting_info
> handle.
> > > For
> > > > now, return an empty nesting info struct for now as true nesting is not
> > > > yet supported by the SMMUs.
> > > >
> > > > Cc: Will Deacon <w...@kernel.org>
> > > > Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.mur...@arm.com>
> > > > Cc: Eric Auger <eric.au...@redhat.com>
> > > > Cc: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-phili...@linaro.org>
> > > > Suggested-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-phili...@linaro.org>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Liu Yi L <yi.l....@intel.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun....@linux.intel.com>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.au...@redhat.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > v5 -> v6:
> > > > *) add review-by from Eric Auger.
> > > >
> > > > v4 -> v5:
> > > > *) address comments from Eric Auger.
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c | 29
> > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> > > > drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c | 29
> > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> > > > 2 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
> > > b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
> > > > index 7196207..016e2e5 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
> > > > @@ -3019,6 +3019,32 @@ static struct iommu_group
> > > *arm_smmu_device_group(struct device *dev)
> > > > return group;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > +static int arm_smmu_domain_nesting_info(struct
> arm_smmu_domain
> > > *smmu_domain,
> > > > + void *data)
> > > > +{
> > > > + struct iommu_nesting_info *info = (struct iommu_nesting_info
> > > *)data;
> > > > + unsigned int size;
> > > > +
> > > > + if (!info || smmu_domain->stage !=
> ARM_SMMU_DOMAIN_NESTED)
> > > > + return -ENODEV;
> > > > +
> > > > + size = sizeof(struct iommu_nesting_info);
> > > > +
> > > > + /*
> > > > + * if provided buffer size is smaller than expected, should
> > > > + * return 0 and also the expected buffer size to caller.
> > > > + */
> > > > + if (info->argsz < size) {
> > > > + info->argsz = size;
> > > > + return 0;
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + /* report an empty iommu_nesting_info for now */
> > > > + memset(info, 0x0, size);
> > > > + info->argsz = size;
> > > > + return 0;
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > static int arm_smmu_domain_get_attr(struct iommu_domain
> *domain,
> > > > enum iommu_attr attr, void *data)
> > > > {
> > > > @@ -3028,8 +3054,7 @@ static int
> arm_smmu_domain_get_attr(struct
> > > iommu_domain *domain,
> > > > case IOMMU_DOMAIN_UNMANAGED:
> > > > switch (attr) {
> > > > case DOMAIN_ATTR_NESTING:
> > > > - *(int *)data = (smmu_domain->stage ==
> > > ARM_SMMU_DOMAIN_NESTED);
> > > > - return 0;
> > > > + return
> arm_smmu_domain_nesting_info(smmu_domain,
> > > data);
> > >
> > > Thanks for the patch.
> > > This would unnecessarily overflow 'data' for any caller that's expecting
> only
> > > an int data. Dump from one such issue that I was seeing when testing
> > > this change along with local kvmtool changes is pasted below [1].
> > >
> > > I could get around with the issue by adding another (iommu_attr) -
> > > DOMAIN_ATTR_NESTING_INFO that returns (iommu_nesting_info).
> >
> > nice to hear from you. At first, we planned to have a separate iommu_attr
> > for getting nesting_info. However, we considered there is no existing user
> > which gets DOMAIN_ATTR_NESTING, so we decided to reuse it for iommu
> nesting
> > info. Could you share me the code base you are using? If the error you
> > encountered is due to this change, so there should be a place which gets
> > DOMAIN_ATTR_NESTING.
>
> I am currently working on top of Eric's tree for nested stage support [1].
> My best guess was that the vfio_pci_dma_fault_init() method [2] that is
> requesting DOMAIN_ATTR_NESTING causes stack overflow, and corruption.
> That's when I added a new attribute.
I see. I think there needs a change in the code there. Should also expect
a nesting_info returned instead of an int anymore. @Eric, how about your
opinion?
domain = iommu_get_domain_for_dev(&vdev->pdev->dev);
ret = iommu_domain_get_attr(domain, DOMAIN_ATTR_NESTING, &info);
if (ret || !(info.features & IOMMU_NESTING_FEAT_PAGE_RESP)) {
/*
* No need go futher as no page request service support.
*/
return 0;
}
https://github.com/luxis1999/linux-vsva/blob/vsva-linux-5.9-rc6-v8%2BPRQ/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c
Regards,
Yi Liu
> I will soon publish my patches to the list for review. Let me know
> your thoughts.
>
> [1] https://github.com/eauger/linux/tree/5.10-rc4-2stage-v13
> [2] https://github.com/eauger/linux/blob/5.10-rc4-2stage-
> v13/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c#L494
>
> Thanks
> Vivek
>
> >
> > Regards,
> > Yi Liu
>
> [snip]
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
