Hi Yi,

On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 2:29 PM Liu, Yi L <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi Eric,
>
> > From: Auger Eric <[email protected]>
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2021 6:03 PM
> >
> > Hi Yi, Vivek,
> >
> [...]
> > > I see. I think there needs a change in the code there. Should also expect
> > > a nesting_info returned instead of an int anymore. @Eric, how about your
> > > opinion?
> > >
> > >     domain = iommu_get_domain_for_dev(&vdev->pdev->dev);
> > >     ret = iommu_domain_get_attr(domain, DOMAIN_ATTR_NESTING,
> > &info);
> > >     if (ret || !(info.features & IOMMU_NESTING_FEAT_PAGE_RESP)) {
> > >             /*
> > >              * No need go futher as no page request service support.
> > >              */
> > >             return 0;
> > >     }
> > Sure I think it is "just" a matter of synchro between the 2 series. Yi,
>
> exactly.
>
> > do you have plans to respin part of
> > [PATCH v7 00/16] vfio: expose virtual Shared Virtual Addressing to VMs
> > or would you allow me to embed this patch in my series.
>
> My v7 hasn’t touch the prq change yet. So I think it's better for you to
> embed it to  your series. ^_^
>

Can you please let me know if you have an updated series of these
patches? It will help me to work with virtio-iommu/arm side changes.

Thanks & regards
Vivek
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

Reply via email to