To represent the size of a single allocation, dmapool currently uses
'unsigned int' in some places and 'size_t' in other places.  Standardize
on 'unsigned int' to reduce overhead, but use 'size_t' when counting all
the blocks in the entire pool.

Signed-off-by: Tony Battersby <to...@cybernetics.com>
---

Changes since v5:
moved 'size' down in struct dma_pool to be near the other 32-bit ints.
blks_per_alloc will fill out the hole in a later patch.

This puts an upper bound on 'size' of INT_MAX to avoid overflowing the
following comparison in pool_initialise_page():

unsigned int offset = 0;
unsigned int next = offset + pool->size;
if (unlikely((next + pool->size) > ...

'boundary' is passed in as a size_t but gets stored as an unsigned int.
'boundary' values >= 'allocation' do not have any effect, so clipping
'boundary' to 'allocation' keeps it within the range of unsigned int
without affecting anything else.  A few lines above (not in the diff)
you can see that if 'boundary' is passed in as 0 then it is set to
'allocation', so it is nothing new.  For reference, here is the
relevant code after being patched:

        if (!boundary)
                boundary = allocation;
        else if ((boundary < size) || (boundary & (boundary - 1)))
                return NULL;

        boundary = min(boundary, allocation);

 mm/dmapool.c | 19 +++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/dmapool.c b/mm/dmapool.c
index 1829291f5d70..f85d6bde2205 100644
--- a/mm/dmapool.c
+++ b/mm/dmapool.c
@@ -43,10 +43,10 @@
 struct dma_pool {              /* the pool */
        struct list_head page_list;
        spinlock_t lock;
-       size_t size;
        struct device *dev;
-       size_t allocation;
-       size_t boundary;
+       unsigned int size;
+       unsigned int allocation;
+       unsigned int boundary;
        char name[32];
        struct list_head pools;
 };
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ static ssize_t pools_show(struct device *dev, struct 
device_attribute *attr, cha
        mutex_lock(&pools_lock);
        list_for_each_entry(pool, &dev->dma_pools, pools) {
                unsigned pages = 0;
-               unsigned blocks = 0;
+               size_t blocks = 0;
 
                spin_lock_irq(&pool->lock);
                list_for_each_entry(page, &pool->page_list, page_list) {
@@ -83,9 +83,10 @@ static ssize_t pools_show(struct device *dev, struct 
device_attribute *attr, cha
                spin_unlock_irq(&pool->lock);
 
                /* per-pool info, no real statistics yet */
-               size += sysfs_emit_at(buf, size, "%-16s %4u %4zu %4zu %2u\n",
+               size += sysfs_emit_at(buf, size, "%-16s %4zu %4zu %4u %2u\n",
                                      pool->name, blocks,
-                                     pages * (pool->allocation / pool->size),
+                                     (size_t) pages *
+                                     (pool->allocation / pool->size),
                                      pool->size, pages);
        }
        mutex_unlock(&pools_lock);
@@ -130,7 +131,7 @@ struct dma_pool *dma_pool_create(const char *name, struct 
device *dev,
        else if (align & (align - 1))
                return NULL;
 
-       if (size == 0)
+       if (size == 0 || size > INT_MAX)
                return NULL;
        else if (size < 4)
                size = 4;
@@ -143,6 +144,8 @@ struct dma_pool *dma_pool_create(const char *name, struct 
device *dev,
        else if ((boundary < size) || (boundary & (boundary - 1)))
                return NULL;
 
+       boundary = min(boundary, allocation);
+
        retval = kmalloc(sizeof(*retval), GFP_KERNEL);
        if (!retval)
                return retval;
@@ -303,7 +306,7 @@ void *dma_pool_alloc(struct dma_pool *pool, gfp_t mem_flags,
 {
        unsigned long flags;
        struct dma_page *page;
-       size_t offset;
+       unsigned int offset;
        void *retval;
 
        might_alloc(mem_flags);
-- 
2.25.1

_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

Reply via email to