Tuomo Valkonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2007-05-10, Matti Bickel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Simple question: your license states that anything distributed as "ion" > > must not be altered in any way. > > That is not true. Minor changes can be done, as explained in the > license file.
Right, i missed your clarifications on the bottom. Sorry for that. > > (adding ion-lock) > > What's that? From what i can tell from the patches, it just calls xscreensaver if existant, else uses xlock. > > (--as-needed, paths). > > That flag is seriously broken, BTW. I don't personally use it, to begin with. But there have been users inquiring about, providing patches, and as it's really just a one line change, i added it for their convience. Might make that conditional on --as-needed being in LDFLAGS, though. > Other unapproved patches applied by the building scripts are also > ok, as long as the user must explicitly request them for (catch-all > USE=all etc. must not apply them), and is highly aware that there's > no point in coming crying to me after that. _rc will include a postinstall message that tells users to reproduce with a vanilla build before reporting bugs upstream plus a note that encourages users to go file the bugs at bugs.gentoo.org first. -- Regards, Matti Bickel Encrypted/Signed Email preferred
pgpMl74sIivcz.pgp
Description: PGP signature
