On 18 December 2007 at 12:35, Tuomo Valkonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'd also love to see a WM that encouragees it's users to contribute back, > > Ion is modular. But the moronic FOSS herd does not like modular code: > it wants the original author to maintain their shoddy patches that he > does not care about. That is, once again they want the authors to be > their slave, just like the distros do. >
Or, you could just tell these users to fuck off and not provide support. Seems like a better choice than putting up a license no one can accept which will just make your software less accessible to everyone. I understand the point of what you're doing, but the insanity if what you've done outweighs any real wins for the users. If you don't want people to have access to your software, 'rm' is pretty simple. A retarded license is not. Why put years of work into software only to close development and attach an outrageous license? Do you really hate people that much? Do you hate yourself that much? If your goal is to thin out the size of the ion user pool, then you'll achieve it through this license. Don't mistake this email for me trying to change your mind, because that's a waste of time. -Jordan
