RANDEEP SINGH <randeep.s at samsung.com> writes:

> We want to support 256 bit AES encryption that's why we changed
> AES_MAXROUNDS from 10 to 14.
>
> AS in source rijndael_Encrypt(rijndael_ctx *ctx ... -> rijndaelEncrypt
> (ctx->ek ...
>
> In rijndaelEncrypt function for Nr > 10, we are accessing array
> indices greater that 44. That can cause problem as size of ctx->ek is
> 44.
>
> In case you have some other opinion please share.

Fair enough, I will add AES-256 support based on your patch.

Gr??e
Olaf

Reply via email to