On Thursday 15 January 2015 07:35:18 SOON HWANG CHOI wrote:
> Dear Juneyoung
>
> We have discussed about QA Criteria for IoTivity V1.0 in today's QA CC.
> I attached the result
>
> Next, in case of test case type , Samsung's test case is a kinds of
> API Test Case and Intel's test case is a kinds of integration test case.
> it means Intel already perform integration test in base layer.
>
> we also have plan to perform service Layer's integration test after
> primitive service API is defined this issue is also discussed in QA CC
> but some isssues are not fixed yet
Hi Soonhwang, June
Your email looks like a description of what the priority levels in JIRA are.
Could you or someone in the QA team document them in the wiki?
>From the file, it looks like:
P1 Showstopper - stops the release if unfixed
P2 Major - important, should be fixed, but won't stop the release
P3 Minor - should be fixed
It would help too if you detailed how one should categorise those issues. What
constitutes a showstopper issue? A crash? Any crash? What if it has a simple
workaround? etc.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
