Hi Bernie,

>From Android Platform porting view, Let me list up related tasks as follows.
 - Android Base API re-factorization. (Intel 
 - Corresponding Primitive Service Implementation change for Android Base API 
change.
 - Android Primitive Service API implementation.

Regarding Android Base API re-factorization, we have a common consensus for API 
style among Intel, MediaTek and Samsung, but new API Specification has not been 
shared yet.
According to this new Android Base API, lots of modification will be in the 
primitive service.
We have also made the Android API for primitive service and they are mostly 
ready. But we also have a dependency with Base API change also.
These mis-alignment between new Android Base API and need to be cleared with 
additional time.

BR, Uze Choi
-----Original Message-----
From: Keany, Bernie [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Saturday, January 17, 2015 12:53 AM
To: Lankswert, Patrick; juney at samsung.com; SOON HWANG CHOI; Bowden, George; 
iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org; Kourt, Tim A
Cc: Skarpness, Mark; felix.freimann at mediatek.com; Agerstam, Mats G; ???; 
???; ??; ???; ???; ???; ???; ???; ???; ???; ???; ???; Subramaniam, Ravi; Moses, 
Jaideep; Tung, Mark Y; Mirani, Jawid; Badder, Christopher S
Subject: Re: IoTivity v1.0.0 criteria proposal

Hi Pat .. Thanks for connecting the threads. we?ve completed a significantly 
refactored Android API implementation that includes OIC Client and Server 
support, this is based on the code we shared in mid December with Samsung and 
MediaTek but migrated to M2.

We believe we will push the code to a WIP branch by Tuesday or Wednesday of 
next week and look forward to feedback from the community. After some review 
time we will submit to gerrit for upstreaming to the master branch.

Thanks
Bernie

From: <Lankswert>, Patrick <patrick.lankswert at 
intel.com<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Friday, January 16, 2015 at 7:42 AM
To: "juney at samsung.com<mailto:juney at samsung.com>" <juney at 
samsung.com<mailto:juney at samsung.com>>, SOON HWANG CHOI <soonhwang.choi at 
samsung.com<mailto:soonhwang.choi at samsung.com>>, "Bowden, George" 
<george.bowden at intel.com<mailto:george.bowden at intel.com>>, "iotivity-dev 
at lists.iotivity.org<mailto:iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org>" <iotivity-dev 
at lists.iotivity.org<mailto:iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org>>
Cc: "Skarpness, Mark" <mark.skarpness at intel.com<mailto:mark.skarpness at 
intel.com>>, Felix Freimann <felix.freimann at 
mediatek.com<mailto:felix.freimann at mediatek.com>>, "Agerstam, Mats G" 
<mats.g.agerstam at intel.com<mailto:mats.g.agerstam at intel.com>>, ??? 
<thetruth.lee at samsung.com<mailto:thetruth.lee at samsung.com>>, ??? 
<kangtae.kim at samsung.com<mailto:kangtae.kim at samsung.com>>, ?? <kyeo at 
samsung.com<mailto:kyeo at samsung.com>>, ??? <igkim.kim at 
samsung.com<mailto:igkim.kim at samsung.com>>, "jinguk.jeong at 
samsung.com<mailto:jinguk.jeong at samsung.com>" <jinguk.jeong at 
samsung.com<mailto:jinguk.jeong at samsung.com>>, "Choi) ???(Uze" <uzchoi at 
samsung.com<mailto:uzchoi at samsung.com>>, ??? <yw1201.kim at 
samsung.com<mailto:yw1201.kim at samsung.com>>, ??? <seungjoong.kim at 
samsung.com<mailto:seungjoong.kim at samsung.com>>, ??? <sungkyu.ko at 
samsung.com<mailto:sungkyu.ko at samsung.com>>, ??? <junghyun.oh at 
samsung.com<mailto:junghyun.oh at samsung.com>>, ??? <soohong.park at 
samsung.com<mailto:soohong.park at samsung.com>>, ??? <moonki1.hong at 
samsung.com<mailto:moonki1.hong at samsung.com>>, "Subramaniam, Ravi" 
<ravi.subramaniam at intel.com<mailto:ravi.subramaniam at intel.com>>, "Moses, 
Jaideep" <jaideep.moses at intel.com<mailto:jaideep.moses at intel.com>>, 
"Tung, Mark Y" <mark.y.tung at intel.com<mailto:mark.y.tung at intel.com>>, 
"Mirani, Jawid" <jawid.mirani at intel.com<mailto:jawid.mirani at intel.com>>, 
"Badder, Christopher S" <christopher.s.badder at 
intel.com<mailto:christopher.s.badder at intel.com>>, Bernie Keany 
<bernie.keany at intel.com<mailto:bernie.keany at intel.com>>
Subject: RE: Re: Re: RE: IoTivity v1.0.0 criteria proposal

June,
It would be best to take these discussion to the mailing list.
Bernie?s team,  which was not on this email, had some time and has flushed out 
the server API for Android. I cannot commit for them, but I think that they are 
close to done with the implementation.
Pat

From: JuneYong Young [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, January 16, 2015 3:01 AM
To: SOON HWANG CHOI; ???; Bowden, George; iotivity-dev at 
lists.iotivity.org<mailto:iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org>
Cc: Skarpness, Mark; Lankswert, Patrick; felix.freimann at 
mediatek.com<mailto:felix.freimann at mediatek.com>; Agerstam, Mats G; ???; 
???; ??; ???; ???; ???; ???; ???; ???; ???; ???; ???; Subramaniam, Ravi; Moses, 
Jaideep; Tung, Mark Y; Mirani, Jawid; Badder, Christopher S
Subject: Re: Re: Re: RE: IoTivity v1.0.0 criteria proposal


Please refer to the updated "IoTivity v1.0.0 release criteria" in the attached.

If anyone have an opinion, then let me know.



George, Felix,

Would you have any comments for the following action items?

1


George & Felix to give opinion about v1.0.0 concept (~1/9)


close


2


George & Felix to provide the additional features that will be on v1.0.0 if any 
(~1/9)


3


George & Felix to provide the backward compatibility review result  (~1/16 or 
earlier)


?




Felix,

Could you let me know if Android server API implementation is to be in v1.0.0?

?Android Support


Android API refactoring and completion (Server API Support)


TBD




June Yong Young

Principal Engineer
Web & Convergence Team, Software R&D Center Samsung Electronics Co.,Ltd.

T: +82-31-301-6107, M: +82-10-9530-6107
E-mail :juney at samsung.com<mailto:juney at samsung.com>



------- Original Message -------

Sender : SOON HWANG CHOI<soonhwang.choi at samsung.com<mailto:soonhwang.choi at 
samsung.com>> S5/Senior Engineer/SQE Lab./Samsung Electronics

Date : 2015-01-15 16:35 (GMT+09:00)

Title : Re: Re: RE: IoTivity v1.0.0 criteria proposal



Dear Juneyoung



     We have discussed about QA Criteria for IoTivity V1.0 in today's QA CC.

     I attached the result



     Next,  in case of test case type , Samsung's test case is a kinds of API 
Test Case

     and Intel's test case is a kinds of integration test case.

     it means Intel already perform integration test in base layer.



     we also have plan to perform service Layer's integration test  after 
primitive service API is defined

     this issue is also discussed in QA CC but some isssues are not fixed yet





Best Regrads

Soonhwang Choi



------- Original Message -------

Sender : JuneYong Young<juney at samsung.com<mailto:juney at samsung.com>> 
S6/Principal Engineer/IoT Solution Lab./Samsung Electronics

Date : 2015-01-10 18:32 (GMT+09:00)

Title : Re: RE: IoTivity v1.0.0 criteria proposal



George,



Please refer to my comments in [June] below.



Regards

June


June Yong Young

Principal Engineer
Web & Convergence Team, Software R&D Center Samsung Electronics Co.,Ltd.

T: +82-31-301-6107, M: +82-10-9530-6107
E-mail :juney at samsung.com<mailto:juney at samsung.com>



------- Original Message -------

Sender : Bowden, George<george.bowden at intel.com<mailto:george.bowden at 
intel.com>>

Date : 2015-01-08 23:44 (GMT+09:00)

Title : RE: IoTivity v1.0.0 criteria proposal


Hi June Yong,
Thank you for initiating this conversation.
I generally agree with your basic concept for v1.0.0 and would like to add the 
following comments:

1.      I don?t believe that backward compatibility between v0.9.0 and v1.0.0 
should be an absolute requirement.  I do believe it is a ?nice to have? if 
possible, but not at the cost of adding significant complexity

        that would need to be carried forward for future 1.x releases.  I do 
believe that v1.0.0 should implement the pieces that set the foundation for 
what other v1.x should be compatible with (e.g., v1.1.x ? v1.9.x should all be 
backward compatible with v1.0.0).

        I believe we still need to decide if v2.x releases should be backward 
compatible with v1.x releases, but I suspect that it may not be the case that 
they are.

 ->  Correct, the backward compatibiliy check result I meant was to check if 
further implementation is required for v1.0.0 release based on current v0.9.0 
base. Those implementations should be added in v1.0.0 if any.


2.      I do not understand what it means for QA to both ?Run v1.0.0 full test 
cases? and ?API test case only?.  I look to Soonhwang to help better define the 
set and type of test cases to be run.  While I understand why we may choose to 
not fully execute integration tests at this time, I do think we should complete 
at least a minimal set of integration QA on the release before calling it 
v1.0.0.

-> [June] This issue will be more clear when SoonHwang sort out the 
-> criteria, but Integration QA test stil requires further discussioin 
-> among member company QA teams about how to integrate test cases,

                how to manage R&R for each member company, and what kind of QA 
tools to be used, and so on. So, there is a possiblity that Integration test 
discussion will not be finalized before v1.0.0

                if v1.0.0 schedule is determined not too far.



3.     In addition to executing tests to help measure the quality of the 
release, I believe that we need to resolve all of the critical/P1 defects and 
majority of the high/P2 defects found during test before releasing v1.0.0.

      We?ve yet to collectively define what we mean by ?critical? and ?high? 
but I generally mean that ?critical? defects are ones that prevent IoTivity 
from being usable (e.g., crashes under basic conditions),

      expose IoTivity or its contributors  to financial or legal liabilities, 
or cause negative impact to the IoTivity brand image.  ?high? severity defects 
could be considered as release reliability defects ? with too many of them 
remaining,

     the overall release may be considered unusable (these are the type of 
defects we?re often compelled to describe in release notes if left unresolved).

-> [June] These issues will be more clear in SoonHang's proposal in discussion 
with each QA lead.




4.      We may need a final ISG decision after receiving input from OIC 
Marketing stating if enough IoTivity features have been implemented to call the 
release v1.0.0 when considering the state of the OIC standards specification 
and competing IoT implementations.

-> [June] Yes, we will need a final ISG decision, but at first my glance, 
adding more features Marketing will want to add in v1.0.0 is slightly different 
from my intention of basic concept "0.9.0 base + incomplete/missing features".

               We need to talk later on.


I?ll re-review the feature list but I don?t believe there are major ?customer 
visible? features missing, but I do believe there are a lot of cleanup  work 
items remaining at this time (e.g., fixing readmes, directory structure 
changes, unit test integration with build, etc.).

Finally, is there a reason why we are not using a mailing list for this 
discussion?

-- George


From: SOON HWANG CHOI [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2015 3:31 AM
To: ???; Tung, Mark Y; Mirani, Jawid
Cc: Skarpness, Mark; Bowden, George; Lankswert, Patrick; felix.freimann at 
mediatek.com<mailto:felix.freimann at mediatek.com>; Agerstam, Mats G; ???; 
???; ??; ???; ???; ???; ???; ???; ???; ???; ???; ???; Subramaniam, Ravi; Moses, 
Jaideep
Subject: RE: IoTivity v1.0.0 criteria proposal


Dear June Yong



     We will provide feedback for Action Item #4 after discussion with Intel QA 
Team.



Dear Mirani and Mark.



     Let's discuss the issue of Acion Item #4 in Next  week's CC (1/15)

     We will provide our side opinion earler.



Regards

Soonhwang Choi







------- Original Message -------

Sender : ???<juney at samsung.com<mailto:juney at samsung.com>> S6(??)/??/IoT 
Solution Lab(S/W??)/????

Date : 2015-01-08 19:15 (GMT+09:00)

Title : IoTivity v1.0.0 criteria proposal



Hello George, Felix,



This is my personal thought on v1.0.0 criteria.

Could you provide your opinion per my proposal?
Basic concept on V1.0.0

Same v0.9.0 feature base

?

Apply only missing features & incompleted items of v0.9.0

?

Apply the additional/revised items(APIs, code structure, etc) to maintain 
backward compatibility

?

Merge Master/CA/CM branch onto one branch(master repo.)

?

v1.0.0 QA Criteria
  . Run v1.0.0 full test cases
  . API test case only
   (Integration QA test case to start since M3)

?




Based on the assumption that the proposal is satisfactory, the following action 
items will be required afterwards

Please refer to the attached.

First of all, I have sorted out the features that were supported on v0.9.0 and 
expected additional features to be supported

on v1.0.0 on Samsung side in the attached.

Could you add the list of the features to be supported on v1.0.0 in the 
attached if any on your side?


Action Items

1

George & Felix to give opinion about v1.0.0 concept (~1/9)

?

2

George & Felix to provide the additional features that will be on v1.0.0 if any 
(~1/9)

?

3

George & Felix to provide the backward compatibility review result (~1/16 or 
earlier)

?

4

SoonHwang to discuss with QA lead for each company to confirm (~1/16 or earlier)
  . if QA criteria on v1.0.0 is ok
  . whether or not the test cases can be integrated
  . when test cases will be completed

?

5

QA Leads to provide v1.0.0 QA test cases to Project Leads (Architects, 
Maintainers, Functions Leads) (TBD)

?

6

June to propose v1.0.0 criteria to ISG (TBD)

?

7

Project Leads to confirm v1.0.0 schedule (TBD)

?




SoonHwang,

Would you please discuss an action item #4 with QA lead for each company and 
let us know your feedback.





---------------------------------


Features on V0.9.0 vs V1.0.0


Features

V0.9.0

V1.0.0

V1.x(M3)

Ownership

Feature

Detail

Remark

12-30

TBD

Schedule

March

Company

Notification
Manager

Lite Device Resource Discovery

Investigating on how to revise Noti. Mgmt. on Base APIs.

N

TBD

?

Y

Samsung

Formation of the Virtual Resource for Lite Device

N

TBD

?

Y

Samsung

Resource proxy instead of Lite Device using Virtual Resource

N

TBD

?

Y

Samsung

Soft Sensor
Manager

?Physical Sensor Data Listening

?

Y

Y

?

Y

Samsung

Developing template for Sensor Fusion as a library andDeploying/Executing the 
library

?

Y

Y

?

Y

Samsung

Query-based Sensor Data Request

?

Y

Y

?

Y

Samsung

Reference soft sensors

?

Y

Y

?

Y

Samsung

?

Bridging in a local network using Pluggable Protocols Converters

?

Y

Y

?

Y

Samsung

Protocol Plugin

C/C++ and Java Support for Multi Platforms
  - Linux, Android, Tizen

?

N

Y

?

Y

Samsung

Hue Plugin with C/C++
  - On/Off, Change Color, Dimming

?

N

Y

?

Y

Samsung

MQTT Plugin with C/C++
  - FAN On/Off

?

Y

Y

?

Y

Samsung

Gear Plugin with Java(Android only)
  - Notification to Gear
  - User Activity Event Receiving from Gear

?

Y

Y

?

Y

Samsung

Belkin Wemo Plugin with Java(Android only)
  - Motion Sensor, Switch On/Off

?

N

Y

?

Y

Samsung

Things Manager

Find appropriate resources for the specific group

?

Y

Y

?

Y

Samsung

Find/Create/Delete a group

?

Y

Y

?

Y

Samsung

Join/Leave

?

Y

Y

?

Y

Samsung

Let the other devices to join the specific group

?

Y

Y

?

Y

Samsung

Get the information of all groups

?

Y

Y

?

Y

Samsung

Check presence information of group (member resource's connectivity/resource 
change)

?

Y

Y

?

Y

Samsung

Take a single action on a group to affect all member resources (Group Action 
using ActionSet)

?

Y

Y

?

Y

Samsung

CRUD function for ActionSet

?

Y

Y

?

Y

Samsung

Send configuration/diagnostics command to multiple things

?

Y

Y

?

Y

Samsung

Get the parameter list of configuration feature

?

Y

Y

?

Y

Samsung

Get the functionality list of diagnostics feature

?

Y

Y

?

Y

Samsung

Control Manager

Provides framework and services to implement a Controller with Smart Home Data 
Model

?

Y

Y

?

Y

Samsung

Provides RESTful Resource Request/Response handler with Device Discovery and 
Subscription/Notification Manager

?

Y

Y

?

Y

Samsung

Provides framework and services to implement a Controlee

?

Y

Y

?

Y

Samsung

Provides RESTful Resource request Handler to perform the action requested by 
the Controllers

?

Y

Y

?

Y

Samsung

Provides discovery of the devices and resources a device hosts

?

Y

Y

?

Y

Samsung

Handles subscription requests from the Controllers

?

Y

Y

?

Y

Samsung

Provides HTTP based REST framework for Control Manager

?

Y

Y

?

Y

Samsung

Android Support

Supports client side Java APIs for Android

?

Y

Y

?

Y

MediaTek

Requires Android NDK version 10 or later

?

Y

Y

?

Y

MediaTek

Requires Android SDK API level 19

?

Y

Y

?

Y

MediaTek

Sample applications demonstrate Java SDK

?

Y

Y

?

Y

MediaTek

Android API refactoring and completion (Server API Support)

?

N

Y

?

Y

MediaTek

Security

Bootstrapping Channel Protection API (Na?ve, ECDH)

Review in progress

N

TBD

?

Y

Samsung

Connectivity Abstraction

This feature integrates the resource model (aka Resource Introspection - RI) 
and Connectivity Abstraction (CA) layers.

?

Y

Y

?

Y

Intel

The CA layer provides abstraction to the RI layer from adaptors and transport 
protocols. This release showcases the integration of RI and CA layers over 
multiple heterogeneous adaptors (Wi-Fi and Ethernet).

?

Y

Y

?

Y

Samsung

Features existing with RI and CA integration- Discovery (multicast and 
unicast), GET, PUT, POST, DELETE and Observe and Active Discovery (aka 
presence).

?

Y

Y

?

Y

Samsung

Supports both secure and non-secure resources.

?

Y

Y

?

Y

Samsung

The user has the option to include/exclude the CA layer using compiler flag 
CA_INT. In the current code by default the CA_INT compiler flag is included and 
hence the CA layer is included.

?

Y

Y

?

Y

Intel

Some of the C/C++ APIs have changed for CA integration. These changes are 
included in the CA_INT flag in the header files.

?

Y

Y

?

Y

Intel

During resource discovery it is possible for the same resource to be discovered 
on multiple adaptors. To resolve this a Server Identifier (SID) is included in 
the resource discovery response.

?

Y

Y

?

Y

Intel

The discovery response also includes the adaptor type on which the resource was 
discovered (Ethernet, Wi-Fi, etc) and this information is passed to the 
application. If the same resource is reachable via multiple adaptors, i.e. it 
has been discovered on multiple connectivity types, the application must 
specify which interface to use for subsequent GET/PUT/POST/DELETE/observe 
operations.

?

Y

Y

?

Y

Samsung

Unicast discovery uses port 5683; multicast discovery uses port 5298

?

Y

Y

?

Y

Samsung

Sample application demonstrating CA integration:
- ocserver and occlient in C sample.
- simpleserver and simpleclient C++ sample.
- presenceserver C31and presenceclient C++ sample.

?

Y

Y

?

Y

Samsung

BLE Support

?

N

Y

?

Y

Samsung

?Support for HIGH QoS.

?

N

Y

?

Y

Samsung

slow response.

?

N

Y

?

Y

Samsung

Device discovery works on a single adaptor.

?

N

Y

?

Y

Samsung

Only unicast presence supported.

?

N

Y

?

Y

Samsung

CA integration has been tested only on Ubuntu.

?

N

Y

?

Y

Samsung

Discovery and Connectivity

CoAP model- IoTvity supports information exchange and control based on the 
messaging/CoAP model. IoTivity also manages radio connections between devices 
(Wi-Fi, LAN) and across any available transport, whether it?s device-to-device 
or across the same network

?

?

?

?

?

Intel

Discovery- This feature provides discovery mechanisms for finding resources in 
proximity.

?

?

?

?

?

Intel

Device Discovery- This feature provides a mechanism to find devices based on 
specific device-level attributes.

?

?

?

?

?

Intel

Active Discovery- This feature provides presence notifications based on a) a 
resource coming online or b) a change in a resource's properties or c) a 
resource going offline. It allows a client to subscribe/unsubscribe (unicast or 
multicast) for presence notifications.

?

?

?

?

?

Intel

Resource Management

Resource model operations- IoTivity supports fundamental resource model based 
operations such as GET, PUT, POST, DELETE apart from Observations and its 
notifications. Observe notifications can be sent to all clients or to a 
specific set of clients.

?

?

?

?

?

Intel

Entity Handler support- This allows a server app developer to handle incoming 
client requests and respond after processing the requests. A default device 
entity handler is also supported to handle a request that does not match the 
existing registered resource.

?

?

?

?

?

Intel

Header Options support- This feature allows the client to send custom header 
options to the server and vice-versa.

?

?

?

?

?

Intel

QoS support- This feature allows the app developer to choose the quality of 
service which currently translates to non-confirmable (LOW_QoS) and confirmable 
(HIGH_QoS) in CoAP.

?

?

?

?

?

Intel

SDK- The SDK abstracts all the OS APIs for radio connections into simpler APIs. 
SDK provides APIs for platform initialization (Client/Server/Client-Server mode 
in In-Proc model), discovery of resources, discovery of devices, 
registration/creation of resources and resource model operations.

?

?

?

?

?

Intel

Collection- This feature provides a root resource to point to other resources. 
This features includes operations on default, linklist and batch interfaces on 
a collection resource.

?

?

?

?

?

Intel

JSON format- IoTivity uses JSON data format with JSON serialization and 
de-serialization in C++ SDK layer.

?

?

?

?

?

Intel

Slow response- This feature allows a server application to indicate 'slow 
response' to a client on an incoming request. This enables the server process 
the request, then send a response at a later time.

?

?

?

?

?

Intel

Security- This feature provides security that allows app developers to create 
secure resources and communicate with resources in a secured channel.

?

?

?

?

?

Intel

Tizen Support

IoTivity project build supported on Tizen 2.3 and 3.0 (both on IA and ARM 
version)

?

?

?

?

?

Intel

No new specific APIs for Tizen; Tizen development support and build process 
provided in "Readme.scons.txt"

?

?

?

?

?

Intel

Yocto Support

meta-oic software layer for Yocto separately hosted on git.yoctoproject.org.

?

?

?

?

?

Intel

Contains recipes to build the IoTivity framework and SDK for Yocto based 
embedded targets.

?

?

?

?

?

Intel

Can utilize Yocto provisioned infrastructure to construct target toolchains to 
cross-compile IoTivity applications for that target.

?

?

?

?

?

Intel

Tested successfully on Intel Edison and MinnowBoard MAX platforms.

?

?

?

?

?

Intel

Currently supports the resource layer (runtimes and applications) of the 
IoTivity stack.

?

?

?

?

?

Intel

OICSensorBoard provides sample IoTivity application for the Intel Edison 
Platform.

?

?

?

?

?

Intel

Demonstrates IoTivity Server capabilities on the Edison through the integration 
of an add-on breadboard that hosts temperature, ambient light and LED resources.

?

?

?

?

?

Intel

Client-server functionality successfully tested by building server using Yocto 
toolchain for Edison and client for Ubuntu.

?

?

?

?

?

Intel

Fully documented connection diagram of sensors to Edison, build configuration, 
supported IoTivity interfaces and methods, and client/server.

?

?

?

?

?

Intel

Scons Support

SCons provides cross-platform build tool.

?

?

?

?

?

Intel

IoTivity project can be built on Linux, Windows, MAC OSX for various OS(Linux, 
Tizen, Android, Arduino, Windos, MAC OSX, iOS).
SCons readme file available at parent folder 'iotivity'.

?

?

?

?

?

Intel



June Yong Young

Principal Engineer
Web & Convergence Team, Software R&D Center Samsung Electronics Co.,Ltd.

T: +82-31-301-6107, M: +82-10-9530-6107
E-mail :juney at samsung.com<mailto:juney at samsung.com>






 Choi, Soon Hwang
 Senior Engineer / Ph. D.
 Software Engineering Lab (SE Lab)
 Digital Media & Communication R&D Center

 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO.,LTD

 AnyCall  +82-10-7311-0206
 e-mail    soonhwang.choi at samsung.com<mailto:soonhwang.choi at samsung.com>









 Choi, Soon Hwang
 Senior Engineer / Ph. D.
 Software Engineering Lab (SE Lab)
 Digital Media & Communication R&D Center

 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO.,LTD

 AnyCall  +82-10-7311-0206
 e-mail    soonhwang.choi at samsung.com<mailto:soonhwang.choi at samsung.com>






[cid:image001.gif at 01D03179.22DDF600]

[http://ext.samsung.net/mailcheck/SeenTimeChecker?do=6db27cebcd8822fb77117ef89cc77e93dc8928a02cb65e9187dfe03c47d8dbcb08c5ce1bd480a15cd4a87a1fb2ad96504bea3c1765014a1208cece8541bc14eacf878f9a26ce15a0]

Reply via email to