On 06/15/2016 10:09 AM, Philippe Coval wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Gregg Reynolds <dev at mobileink.com > <mailto:dev at mobileink.com>> wrote: > > Reviewers of https://gerrit.iotivity.org/gerrit/#/c/8603/ rightly pointed > out that it is not maximally portable. FWIW I do not think patches that make > Iotivity run on a new platform > > > > Instead of timer/linux.c, we would have timer/posix.c, which would not be > linux-specific (would it work for Tizen?). > > > yea Tizen is based on Linux (libc etc). or should we call it Tizen/GNU/Linux > , so no blocker here. > I am wondering about using a middleware for OS abstraction wouldn't this help > instead recreating one ?
the tizen port is a bit of an odd beast... it's a Linux kernel and libc underneath, but often you're expected to do (certain) things through an additional middleware layer that abstracts things like, oh, bluetooth access. this is not instructions to do anything, just a heads up for those not familiar that sometimes the tizen port does things not-like-any-other-linux where you might not at first think it needs to be different. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.iotivity.org/pipermail/iotivity-dev/attachments/20160615/71b4f699/attachment.html>
