On quarta-feira, 15 de junho de 2016 16:42:16 PDT Gregg Reynolds wrote:
> Here's a nutty idea: just use time().  Does Iotivity really need sub-second
> timing? I don't know the code that well but I'm going to go out on a limb
> and say no.

We may need monotonic timing, though.

-- 
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
  Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center

Reply via email to