Hi Wouter, Thank you for the explanation. I tried to use the raml2doc a week ago and couldn't succeed for the script I saw was for Windows. Do you know a way I can generate it with Linux? (also, I saw raml is v0.8, not sure if this is ok or if I should look for 1.0 specs).
Best regards, Lapprand Em sex, 16 de fev de 2018 às 12:42, Wouter van der Beek (wovander) < wovan...@cisco.com> escreveu: > Hi Arthur, > > > > These descriptions are the real thing. > > e.g. it is the single source that is being used to create the > specification text. > > > > OCF has an test tool that also uses these descriptions, the RAML is used > to verify which methods, queryparams, etc are used for each resource. > > The schemas are used to validate the actual payloads on the wire. > > See the internal OCF website to download the CTT tool. > > > > Also these descriptions can be used to generate an application skeleton. > > See https://github.com/openconnectivityfoundation/DeviceBuilder > > > > Kind Regards, > Wouter > > > > *From:* iotivity-dev-boun...@lists.iotivity.org [mailto: > iotivity-dev-boun...@lists.iotivity.org] *On Behalf Of *Arthur Barros > Lapprand > *Sent:* 16 February 2018 15:36 > *To:* chiayu...@ite.com.tw > > > *Cc:* iotivity-dev@lists.iotivity.org > *Subject:* Re: [dev] OCF Conformance Test Tool > > > > Hi again, > > > > I have some questions I've been asking myself for a while. If someone > could briefly answer one or more of them I'd be grateful, they're OCF > related: > > > > 1 - the OCF github repository has those json/raml/swagger files which from > what i've seen describe parts of the OCF specification. Are those files > really describing it or are they meant for something else? > > > > 2 - does IoTivity uses these schemas to check its implementation? if so, > how is that done? > > > > I have yet to work with these file types so pardon my ignorance in this > matter. > > > > Regards, > > Lapprand > > > > Em ter, 13 de fev de 2018 às 03:28, Arthur Barros Lapprand < > a...@cin.ufpe.br> escreveu: > > Well I guess I've read it wrong. Thank you for the information! > > > > Regards, > > Lapprand > > > > On Sun, Feb 11, 2018, 23:32 <chiayu...@ite.com.tw> wrote: > > https://openconnectivity.org/foundation/join > > > > *Gold Member Benefits (Annual Dues: $2,000 USD)* > > Eligible to participate in a non-voting capacity in Work Groups > > Eligible to lead and participate in Task Groups in a non-voting capacity > > Eligible to seek OCF and UPnP certification of products and/or services > > Eligible to use the organization's trademarks in connection with Member's > certified products and/or services > > > > *Basic Member Benefits (Annual Dues: $0 USD)* > > Eligible to have read only rights for members-only materials > > Eligible to access the OCF and UPnP certification test tools for pre-testing > purposes only (cannot certify devices) > > > > Best Regards, > > ChiaYu > > > > *From:* iotivity-dev-boun...@lists.iotivity.org [mailto: > iotivity-dev-boun...@lists.iotivity.org] *On Behalf Of *Arthur Barros > Lapprand > *Sent:* Monday, February 12, 2018 12:01 AM > *To:* dwarka.day...@samsung.com > *Cc:* iotivity-dev@lists.iotivity.org > *Subject:* Re: [dev] OCF Conformance Test Tool > > > > Oh, ok, thanks! I read somewhere that basic membership couldn't access the > test tool. > > > > Regards, > > Lapprand > > > > Em dom, 11 de fev de 2018 às 12:23, 드와르카 <dwarka.day...@samsung.com> > escreveu: > > Basic membersip is free. > > > > Regards > > Dwarka > > Sent from Knox Portal for Mobile > > > > ---------* Original Message* --------- > *Sender : *Arthur Barros Lapprand <a...@cin.ufpe.br> > *Date : *2018-02-10 01:39 (GMT+5) > *Title : *Re: [dev] OCF Conformance Test Tool > > Hi Mats, > > > > Thank you for responding. So I guess I need to pay $1000,00 in order to > check that tool, needn't I? > > > > Regards, > > Lapprand > > > > Em sex, 9 de fev de 2018 às 16:53, Mats Wichmann <m...@wichmann.us> > escreveu: > > On 02/09/2018 12:46 PM, Arthur Barros Lapprand wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > > I recently had a look for OCF tests within IoTivity and found this > > wiki page <https://wiki.iotivity.org/conformance_test_tool>. It mentions > > OIC testing. So my questions are: > > > > [1] are these instructions still valid? > > [2] are there tests for the Java API? > > [3] are there any *references to the OCF specifications* within the > tests? > > The ctt branch is unmaintained. > > The OCF-sponsored test tool is probably a better bet (and it does have > spec references in the test cases). It's free to OCF members, but is > not open source etc. > > > > > > I couldn't easily find tests for OCF specific rules, can someone share > some > > knowledge about this? I did find this api_test_guide > > <https://wiki.iotivity.org/iotivity_api_test_guide> but can't figure out > > how much up-to-date it is. > > > > Thank you in advance, > > Lapprand > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > iotivity-dev mailing list > > iotivity-dev@lists.iotivity.org > > https://lists.iotivity.org/mailman/listinfo/iotivity-dev > > > > _______________________________________________ > iotivity-dev mailing list > iotivity-dev@lists.iotivity.org > https://lists.iotivity.org/mailman/listinfo/iotivity-dev > > _______________________________________________ > > iotivity-dev mailing list > > iotivity-dev@lists.iotivity.org > > https://lists.iotivity.org/mailman/listinfo/iotivity-dev > > > > > >
_______________________________________________ iotivity-dev mailing list iotivity-dev@lists.iotivity.org https://lists.iotivity.org/mailman/listinfo/iotivity-dev
