I’m also supportive of the new name – IoTivity-Lite. cheers, Margaret
From: 최우제 [mailto:uzc...@samsung.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2018 1:50 AM To: Christian Gran <g...@lynxtechnology.com> Cc: LaBrecque, Margaret <margaret.labrec...@intel.com>; iotivity-dev@lists.iotivity.org Subject: RE: Re: New filed request for distinguish IoTivity and IoTivity-Lite(IoTivity-constrai Hi Christian, Different jira will do. Please share the uri to access. BR Uze Choi --------- Original Message --------- Sender : Christian Gran <g...@lynxtechnology.com<mailto:g...@lynxtechnology.com>> Date : 2018-03-28 17:19 (GMT+9) Title : Re: New filed request for distinguish IoTivity and IoTivity-Lite(IoTivity-constrained) Hi, the original idea was to have a 2nd Jira project (it is already there) for constrained. We should not mix the projects - constrained has totally different modules. Shall I rename the iotivity-constrained project to motivity-light ? thanks Christian On 28. Mar 2018, at 05:30, 최우제 (Uze Choi) <uzc...@samsung.com<mailto:uzc...@samsung.com>> wrote: Hi Christian Could you add the filed to select the system between IoTivity and IoTivity-Lite(Official name from OCF) in jira. I believe it will be better to follow OCF naming which is IoTivity-Lite instead of IoTivity-constrained. Margaret, Could you give your opinion for naming? BR, Uze Choi [cid:image001.gif@01D3C73C.4DA7BCC0] [http://ext.samsung.net/mail/ext/v1/external/status/update?userid=uzchoi&do=bWFpbElEPTIwMTgwMzI4MDg0OTM2ZXBjbXMxcDc0ZjY4ZjEzNzU0NDVjOWJmZTgwOWViNjdlNDEwZjQ0NiZyZWNpcGllbnRBZGRyZXNzPW1hcmdhcmV0LmxhYnJlY3F1ZUBpbnRlbC5jb20_]
_______________________________________________ iotivity-dev mailing list iotivity-dev@lists.iotivity.org https://lists.iotivity.org/mailman/listinfo/iotivity-dev
