Re: [dev] New filed request for distinguish IoTivity and IoTivity-Lite(IoTivity-constrai

[조제현]

Hi,   How about add for build(or ci?) components? I actually would like to raise a issue for jenkins build. Please consider about that too. Thanks.  jaehyun.   --------- Original Message --------- Sender : Heldt-Sheller, Nathan <nathan.heldt-shel...@intel.com> Date : 2018-04-03 03:05 (GMT+9) Title : Re: [dev] New filed request for distinguish IoTivity and IoTivity-Lite(IoTivity-constrai   Thanks Christian, worked this time!   From: Christian Gran [mailto:g...@lynxtechnology.com] Sent: Monday, April 2, 2018 10:49 AM To: Heldt-Sheller, Nathan <nathan.heldt-shel...@intel.com>; uzc...@samsung.com; iotivity-dev@lists.iotivity.org; Maloor, Kishen <kishen.mal...@intel.com> Subject: Re: [dev] New filed request for distinguish IoTivity and IoTivity-Lite(IoTivity-constrai   Hi,   added for now security, coap and base stack, so that we can start creating tickets. Please tell me which other components may be needed   thanks   Christian   On 2. Apr 2018, at 19:23, Heldt-Sheller, Nathan <nathan.heldt-shel...@intel.com> wrote:   Hi Christian,   I just tried to add an issue to LITE and couldn’t because “components” haven’t been defined and yet are a required field. Can you add a placeholder “security” component (which can certainly be renamed/removed later if Kishen decides it’s not right)? Thanks, Nathan   From: iotivity-dev-boun...@lists.iotivity.org [mailto:iotivity-dev-boun...@lists.iotivity.org] On Behalf Of ??? (Uze Choi) Sent: Sunday, April 1, 2018 5:55 PM To: iotivity-dev@lists.iotivity.org Subject: Re: [dev] New filed request for distinguish IoTivity and IoTivity-Lite(IoTivity-constrai   For the issue regarding iotivity-constrained repo, Please use the https://jira.iotivity.org/projects/LITE . I copied IoTivity-Constrained stack Jira ticket on iotivity jira into iotivity LITE jira.   Thanks Christian/C.J BR, Uze Choi From: C.J. Collier [mailto:cjcoll...@linuxfoundation.org]  Sent: Friday, March 30, 2018 2:21 AM To: 최우제(Uze Choi) Cc: Christian Gran; iotivity-dev@lists.iotivity.org Subject: Re: [dev] New filed request for distinguish IoTivity and IoTivity-Lite(IoTivity-constrai   https://jira.iotivity.org/projects/LITE   On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 1:49 AM, 최우제 <uzc...@samsung.com> wrote: Hi Christian, Different jira will do. Please share the uri to access. BR Uze Choi   --------- Original Message --------- Sender : Christian Gran <g...@lynxtechnology.com> Date : 2018-03-28 17:19 (GMT+9) Title : Re: New filed request for distinguish IoTivity and IoTivity-Lite(IoTivity-constrained) Hi,    the original idea was to have a 2nd Jira project (it is already there) for constrained. We should not mix the projects - constrained has totally different modules. Shall I rename the iotivity-constrained project to motivity-light ?   thanks   Christian     On 28. Mar 2018, at 05:30, 최우제 (Uze Choi) <uzc...@samsung.com> wrote:   Hi Christian Could you add the filed to select the system between IoTivity and IoTivity-Lite(Official name from OCF) in jira. I believe it will be better to follow OCF naming which is IoTivity-Lite instead of IoTivity-constrained.   Margaret,  Could you give your opinion for naming?   BR, Uze Choi     <image001.gif>  _______________________________________________ iotivity-dev mailing list iotivity-dev@lists.iotivity.org https://lists.iotivity.org/mailman/listinfo/iotivity-dev   _______________________________________________ iotivity-dev mailing list iotivity-dev@lists.iotivity.org https://lists.iotivity.org/mailman/listinfo/iotivity-dev   _______________________________________________ iotivity-dev mailing list iotivity-dev@lists.iotivity.org https://lists.iotivity.org/mailman/listinfo/iotivity-dev

_______________________________________________
iotivity-dev mailing list
iotivity-dev@lists.iotivity.org
https://lists.iotivity.org/mailman/listinfo/iotivity-dev