Hi, Jiong, Thanks for your interest to help with this issue. You can reproduce with the code at https://github.com/sbernard31/udploadbalancer/tree/bf71e99fbd0c3f806a43076fc12a47e966422839 Using command: sudo python ulb.py lo -vip 10.41.44.13 -rs 00:00:00:00:00:00/127.0.0.1 -p 5683 5684 You need to have bcc installed in the system.
Yonghong On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 11:23 PM Yonghong Song via Lists.Iovisor.Org <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 9:06 AM Simon <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > The compiler is doing optimization which make verifier fail. It is possible > > an early compiler with less optimizations may work. > > > > Maybe a silly question, but does it make sense to try to change compiler > > optimization option ? (I tried to play with -O option without success) > > Maybe. I have not looked at this yet from compiler side. Sometimes you > won't have an easy compiler option to turn off. Tuning -O may not > help. Lowering -O to -O1/-O0 may help to remove this particular > optimization, but may introduce more spills which verifier will also > reject. > > > > > Please keep me informed about your progress about this issue :) > > Sure. Will let you know if I have made progress in this. > > > > > Thx again. > > > > > > > > > > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#1625): https://lists.iovisor.org/g/iovisor-dev/message/1625 Mute This Topic: https://lists.iovisor.org/mt/30315706/21656 Mute #verifier: https://lists.iovisor.org/mk?hashtag=verifier&subid=2590197 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.iovisor.org/g/iovisor-dev/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
