I finally discover that checksum can be calculated via incremental update. (see RFC 1624 ( https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1624 ) )
Using it ( https://github.com/sbernard31/udploadbalancer/commit/6d0e9cbd97147dbde9ca5b4058baf4182e925542 ) , I didn't have to deal with dynamic sized payload and so no more issue with the verifier. So I go back to use bcc :) Again, Thx a lot Yonghong for your time ! Please don't forget to keep me in touch about that even if I'm not impacted anymore, I'm curious to know how you move forward on this ! (By the way did you get the point about the error just above, is the verifier able to understand this kind of dynamic check ?) -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#1646): https://lists.iovisor.org/g/iovisor-dev/message/1646 Mute This Topic: https://lists.iovisor.org/mt/30315706/21656 Mute #verifier: https://lists.iovisor.org/mk?hashtag=verifier&subid=2590197 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.iovisor.org/g/iovisor-dev/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
