Hi John
Try to reduce the -w parameter, i know that this parameter is for the tcp
window, but i think iperf send the value of data that you put in the -w
param.
Hope this helps, and best of regards
Alfredo Alcantara
2010/3/22 Donnelly, John <john.donne...@hp.com>
> Has anyone seen this symptom that iperf runs beyond the time limit ?
> ( In this example ... 2 threads ran 161 and 942 seconds instead of 60 ).
>
>
> ssh -f -l root 10.10.50.2 iperf -w 256k -f M -t 60 -c 110.110.60.11
> ssh -f -l root 10.10.50.2 iperf -w 256k -f M -t 60 -c 110.110.60.12
> ssh -f -l root 10.10.50.2 iperf -w 256k -f M -t 60 -c 110.110.60.13
> ssh -f -l root 10.10.50.2 iperf -w 256k -f M -t 60 -c 110.110.60.14
> [ 3] 0.0-60.0 sec 27195 MBytes 453 MBytes/sec
> [ 3] 0.0-60.0 sec 25323 MBytes 422 MBytes/sec
> [ 3] 0.0-161.6 sec 0.97 MBytes 0.01 MBytes/sec
> [ 3] 0.0-942.4 sec 1.51 MBytes 0.00 MBytes/sec
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
> Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
> proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
> See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
> _______________________________________________
> Iperf-users mailing list
> Iperf-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/iperf-users
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Iperf-users mailing list
Iperf-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/iperf-users
