thx . 
 I'll try the 3.xx version .

-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Throckmorton [mailto:thr...@mcnc.org] 


> how did you invoke the iperf server instance?

I run ssh sessions between end points :

servers:

  ssh -f  -l root 10.10.50.2     iPerf -S -d & 
  ssh -f  -l root 10.10.60.2     iPerf -S -d &

clients :

  ssh -f -l root 10.10.60.2 iperf -f M -t 61 -c 100.100.50.11 &
  ssh -f -l root 10.10.60.2 iperf -f M -t 61 -c 100.100.50.12 &
  ssh -f -l root 10.10.60.2 iperf -f M -t 61 -c 100.100.50.13 &
  ssh -f -l root 10.10.60.2 iperf -f M -t 61 -c 100.100.50.14 &
  ssh -f -l root 10.10.60.2 iperf -f M -t 61 -c 100.100.50.15 & 
  ssh -f -l root 10.10.60.2 iperf -f M -t 61 -c 100.100.50.16 & 
  ssh -f -l root 10.10.60.2 iperf -f M -t 61 -c 100.100.50.17 &
  ssh -f -l root 10.10.60.2 iperf -f M -t 61 -c  100.100.50.18 &

  ssh -f -l root 10.10.50.2 iperf -f M -t 61 -c 100.100.60.11 &
  ssh -f -l root 10.10.50.2 iperf -f M -t 61 -c 100.100.60.12 &
  ssh -f -l root 10.10.50.2 iperf -f M -t 61 -c 100.100.60.13 &
  ssh -f -l root 10.10.50.2 iperf -f M -t 61 -c 100.100.60.14 &
  ssh -f -l root 10.10.50.2 iperf -f M -t 61 -c 100.100.60.15 & 
  ssh -f -l root 10.10.50.2 iperf -f M -t 61 -c 100.100.60.16 & 
  ssh -f -l root 10.10.50.2 iperf -f M -t 61 -c 100.100.60.17 &
  ssh -f -l root 10.10.50.2 iperf -f M -t 61 -c  100.100.60.18 &

  The Linux 5.4 machines have multiple ip addesses on a single adapter 
    server 1  <10.10.50.2>             server 2 < 10.10.60.2 >
    ifcfg_eth1:1    100.100.50.11         100.100.60.11
              :2    100.100.50.12         100.100.60.12
              :3
             <n ports>                     <n ports>
                                





>> or  non-C++ Linux version available ?

> Frankly, I am confused by this question...

 A non C++ (non-threaded) version. 



-tt

> ________________________________
> From: Donnelly, John
> Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2010 9:20 AM
> To: 'Jeff W.Boote'
> Cc: Alfredo Alcantara; iperf-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: RE: [Iperf-users] iperf runs beyond time limit
> 
> There is a difference between removing it and reducing it ?
> 
> 
> 
> ________________________________
> From: Jeff W.Boote [mailto:bo...@internet2.edu]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2010 9:11 AM
> To: Donnelly, John
> Cc: Alfredo Alcantara; iperf-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Iperf-users] iperf runs beyond time limit
> 
> Don't remove it. Reduce it.
> 
> jeff
> 
> On Mar 23, 2010, at 8:06 AM, Donnelly, John wrote:
> 
> Removing the -w  didn't seem to cure it:
> 
> ssh -f -l root 10.10.60.2 iperf -f M -t 61 -c 100.100.50.11 ssh -f -l 
> root 10.10.60.2 iperf -f M -t 61 -c 100.100.50.12 ssh -f -l root 
> 10.10.60.2 iperf -f M -t 61 -c 100.100.50.13 ssh -f -l root 10.10.60.2 
> iperf -f M -t 61 -c 100.100.50.14 ssh -f -l root 10.10.60.2 iperf -f M 
> -t 61 -c 100.100.50.15 ssh -f -l root 10.10.60.2 iperf -f M -t 61 -c 
> 100.100.50.16 ssh -f -l root 10.10.60.2 iperf -f M -t 61 -c 
> 100.100.50.17 ssh -f -l root 10.10.60.2 iperf -f M -t 61 -c 
> 100.100.50.18
> [  3]  0.0-61.0 sec  29889 MBytes    490 MBytes/sec
> [  3]  0.0-61.3 sec  2761 MBytes  45.1 MBytes/sec
> [  3]  0.0-61.3 sec  9315 MBytes    152 MBytes/sec
> [  3]  0.0-61.0 sec  7419 MBytes    122 MBytes/sec
> [  3]  0.0-61.0 sec  11141 MBytes    183 MBytes/sec
> [  3]  0.0-115.1 sec  1.92 MBytes  0.02 MBytes/sec [  3]  0.0-114.2 
> sec  0.62 MBytes  0.01 MBytes/sec [  3]  0.0-931.5 sec  1.48 MBytes  
> 0.00 MBytes/sec
> 
> 
> ________________________________
> From: Alfredo Alcantara [mailto:alfredoealcant...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2010 7:51 AM
> To: Donnelly, John
> Cc: 
> iperf-users@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:iperf-us...@lists.sourceforge
> .net>
> Subject: Re: [Iperf-users] iperf runs beyond time limit
> 
> Hi John
> 
> Try to reduce the -w parameter, i know that this parameter is for the tcp 
> window, but i think iperf send the value of data that you put in the -w param.
> 
> Hope this helps, and best of regards
> 
> Alfredo Alcantara
> 
> 
> 2010/3/22 Donnelly, John 
> <john.donne...@hp.com<mailto:john.donne...@hp.com>>
> Has anyone seen this symptom that iperf runs beyond the time limit ?
> ( In this example ... 2 threads ran 161 and 942 seconds  instead of 60 ).
> 
> 
> ssh -f -l root 10.10.50.2 iperf -w 256k -f M -t 60 -c 110.110.60.11 
> ssh -f -l root 10.10.50.2 iperf -w 256k -f M -t 60 -c 110.110.60.12 
> ssh -f -l root 10.10.50.2 iperf -w 256k -f M -t 60 -c 110.110.60.13 
> ssh -f -l root 10.10.50.2 iperf -w 256k -f M -t 60 -c 110.110.60.14
> [  3]  0.0-60.0 sec  27195 MBytes    453 MBytes/sec
> [  3]  0.0-60.0 sec  25323 MBytes    422 MBytes/sec
> [  3]  0.0-161.6 sec  0.97 MBytes  0.01 MBytes/sec [  3]  0.0-942.4 
> sec  1.51 MBytes  0.00 MBytes/sec
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> -------- Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval Try the new 
> software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, 
> and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
> See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
> _______________________________________________
> Iperf-users mailing list
> Iperf-users@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:iperf-us...@lists.sourceforge
> .net> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/iperf-users
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> -------- Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval Try the new 
> software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, 
> and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
> See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev______________________________________
> _________
> Iperf-users mailing list
> Iperf-users@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:iperf-us...@lists.sourceforge
> .net> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/iperf-users
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> -------- Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval Try the new 
> software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, 
> and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
> See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Iperf-users mailing list
> Iperf-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/iperf-users


--
Tom Throckmorton
MCNC - Advanced Services Development
3021 Cornwallis Road
Research Triangle Park, NC 27709
919.248.1448

"Connecting North Carolina's future today"

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Iperf-users mailing list
Iperf-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/iperf-users

Reply via email to