I see, thanks!
regards, Martin On 8/21/14, Metod Kozelj <metod.koz...@lugos.si> wrote: > Hi, > > Martin T je dne 21/08/14 14:17 napisal-a: >> How did Iperf calculate, that it sent 71.5 MBytes? I mean it says it >> has sent 51021 datagrams and one datagram is 1470B so I should have >> sent 75MB instead(51021*1470/10^6). > > Formula > > 151021*1470/1024/1024 > > gives 71.5264 as result. Probably the printout should rather read > > [ 4] 0.0-60.0 sec 71.5 MiBytes 10.0 Mbits/sec > > (note the 'i' in MiBytes). The (unwritten) consent in IT seems to be that > the > data rates (specially so at serial data transmission) should be in decimal > prefixes (M = 10^6) while data volumes should be in binary prefixes (M = > 2^10) > ... at least in technical departments, marketing departments seem to > strictly > use decimal prefixes as they give slightly larger numbers. > > -- > > Peace! > Mkx > > -- perl -e 'print > $i=pack(c5,(41*2),sqrt(7056),(unpack(c,H)-2),oct(115),10);' > -- echo 16i[q]sa[ln0=aln100%Pln100/snlbx]sbA0D4D465452snlb xq | dc > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > BOFH excuse #47: > > Complete Transient Lockout > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Slashdot TV. Video for Nerds. Stuff that matters. http://tv.slashdot.org/ _______________________________________________ Iperf-users mailing list Iperf-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/iperf-users
