Hi, I'm thinking of the recommended configuration when using ipnat with many <--> many and routing. Am I right with the following example:
- interfaces of the firewall box: int0 192.168.0.254 ext0 111.1.1.1 ext0_alias(es) 222.2.2.2/28 - ipnat.conf, something like this: map ext0 192.168.0.0/24 -> 222.2.2.2/28 - defaultrouter for ext0: <--------- my question routes 222.2.2.2/28 to 111.1.1.1 ? and 111.1.1.1 routes internally to nat ip pool? or is it better to assign an adress of 222.2.2.2/28 to the router to talk directly to the pool? Hope someone could help me understand this. Regards, Andy --
