Is there anyone who knows about configuration of many-to-many NAT? Do I have post to the wrong list or is my question not clear enough? Sorry, my english is not the best...
You ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Hi, > > I'm thinking of the recommended configuration when using ipnat with many > <--> many and routing. Am I right with the following example: > > > - interfaces of the firewall box: > int0 192.168.0.254 > > ext0 111.1.1.1 > ext0_alias(es) 222.2.2.2/28 > > > - ipnat.conf, something like this: > map ext0 192.168.0.0/24 -> 222.2.2.2/28 > > > - defaultrouter for ext0: <--------- my question > routes 222.2.2.2/28 to 111.1.1.1 ? and 111.1.1.1 routes internally > to nat ip pool? or is it better to assign an adress of 222.2.2.2/28 to the > router to talk directly to the pool? > > Hope someone could help me understand this. > > Regards, > Andy > > > > -- --
