I've had feedback from someone at Microsoft saying that there is a bug in TCP SACK handling, which is also present in 2003, and that they are working on a bug fix.
Darren
- 4.1.x, OOW and a packet capture. Nick Evans
- Re: 4.1.x, OOW and a packet capture. Martti Kuparinen
- Re: 4.1.x, OOW and a packet capture. Nick Evans
- Re: 4.1.x, OOW and a packet capture. Darren Reed
- Re: 4.1.x, OOW and a packet capture. Darren Reed
- Re: 4.1.x, OOW and a packet capture. Guido van Rooij
- Re: 4.1.x, OOW and a packet capture. Darren Reed
- Re: 4.1.x, OOW and a packet capture... Guido van Rooij
- Re: 4.1.x, OOW and a packet cap... Darren Reed
- RE: 4.1.x, OOW and a packet capture. Nick Evans
- Re: 4.1.x, OOW and a packet capture. Darren Reed
- RE: 4.1.x, OOW and a packet capture. Nick Evans
- Re: 4.1.x, OOW and a packet capture. Darren Reed
- Re: 4.1.x, OOW and a packet capture. Darren Reed
- RE: 4.1.x, OOW and a packet capture. Nick Evans
- Re: 4.1.x, OOW and a packet capture. Darren Reed
- RE: 4.1.x, OOW and a packet capture. Nick Evans
- Re: 4.1.x, OOW and a packet capture. Attila Fülöp
- RE: 4.1.x, OOW and a packet capture. Olmsted, Brian
