At 07:29 AM 06/29/2006, Mike M. Volokhov wrote:
On 6/29/06, J.D. Bronson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I use bimap and wondering if there is some redundancy here:
bimap sppp0 192.168.1.171/32 -> 207.227.112.171/32
bimap sppp0 192.168.1.172/32 -> 207.227.112.172/32
bimap sppp0 192.168.1.173/32 -> 207.227.112.174/32
bimap sppp0 192.168.1.174/32 -> 207.227.112.173/32
map sppp0 192.168.1.171/32 -> 207.227.112.171/32 portmap tcp/udp auto
map sppp0 192.168.1.172/32 -> 207.227.112.172/32 portmap tcp/udp auto
map sppp0 192.168.1.173/32 -> 207.227.112.173/32 portmap tcp/udp auto
map sppp0 192.168.1.174/32 -> 207.227.112.173/32 portmap tcp/udp auto
..when I bimap these 4 machines...do I still need the last 4 rules?
I think no. But you can know if they used at all with "ipnat -hl"
command, and if not, just remove them :-)
--
Mishka.
all of the map statements have '0' hits...so I think your correct to
remvoe these.
thanks
