----- Original Message ----- From: "J.D. Bronson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2006 7:43 PM Subject: ipnat.conf question
> I use bimap and wondering if there is some redundancy here: > > bimap sppp0 192.168.1.171/32 -> 207.227.112.171/32 > bimap sppp0 192.168.1.172/32 -> 207.227.112.172/32 > bimap sppp0 192.168.1.173/32 -> 207.227.112.174/32 > bimap sppp0 192.168.1.174/32 -> 207.227.112.173/32 > map sppp0 192.168.1.171/32 -> 207.227.112.171/32 portmap tcp/udp auto > map sppp0 192.168.1.172/32 -> 207.227.112.172/32 portmap tcp/udp auto > map sppp0 192.168.1.173/32 -> 207.227.112.173/32 portmap tcp/udp auto > map sppp0 192.168.1.174/32 -> 207.227.112.173/32 portmap tcp/udp auto > > > ..when I bimap these 4 machines...do I still need the last 4 rules? > You shouldn't require the map rules when using bimap however you may need to use map for some of the proxies within ipf e.g. map sppp0 0/0 -> 0/0 proxy port ftp ftp/tcp map sppp0 0/0 -> 0/0 proxy port isakmp ipsec/udp Larry.
