I'm guessing that there was a size/space issue with the camera choice . . .the part itself can't cost that much in the quantity that Apple would be buying them. My guess is that either it wouldn't fit or else they concluded that the slight extra cost for the camera in the iPhone 4 wasn't worth it. After all . . .who's going to hold up their iPad to take a picture? Anybody with an iPad likely has an iPhone 4 as well . . .and if they have the iPad with them then they surely have their iPhone 4 with them as well . . .in which case which one are you going to hold up to snap the photo of the Grand Canyon?
On Mar 10, 2011, at 10:43 PM, LuKreme wrote: > On 10-Mar-2011, at 10:56, Kevin Callahan wrote: >> >> Someone sent a report to me saying that while the back-facing camera on new >> iPad 2 does HD, it's only a 0.7 MP camera. >> Is this true/possible? > > True? Probably. Possible? Sure. It's a video camera, intended for video. > >> Anyone know the specs on the camera? > > Best guess is identical to iPod Touch 4. ----------------------------------------------- There are only three kinds of stress; your basic nuclear stress, cooking stress, and A$$hole stress. The key to their relationship is Jello. neil _______________________________________________ iPhone-talk mailing list [email protected] http://www.omnigroup.com/mailman/listinfo/iphone-talk
