On 11-Mar-2011, at 07:19, Neil Laubenthal wrote: > > I'm guessing that there was a size/space issue with the camera choice . . > .the part itself can't cost that much in the quantity that Apple would be > buying them. My guess is that either it wouldn't fit or else they concluded > that the slight extra cost for the camera in the iPhone 4 wasn't worth it.
I think the cost was a minor issue and they decided to hold back the better camera because 1) the iPad would make a really crappy still camera anyway and 2) it gives them something for iPad 3. > After all . . .who's going to hold up their iPad to take a picture? Anybody > with an iPad likely has an iPhone 4 as well . . .and if they have the iPad > with them then they surely have their iPhone 4 with them as well . . .in > which case which one are you going to hold up to snap the photo of the Grand > Canyon? I can see the iPad being used for video chats, but I can't imagine taking many pictures with it. -- 'I thought we could do it without anyone getting hurt. By using our brains.' 'Can't. History don't work like that. Blood first, then brains.' 'Mountains of skulls,' said Truckle. 'There's got to be a better way than fighting,' said Mr Saveloy. 'Yep. Lots of 'em. Only none of 'em work.' _______________________________________________ iPhone-talk mailing list [email protected] http://www.omnigroup.com/mailman/listinfo/iphone-talk
