I don't think so... The reason is, they want to know the *apps* - not the companies... And my guess is, that there will be a couple of restrictions of what the apps are allowed to do.
That's nothing new: Microsoft does that since decades (and nobody really complained), so Apple just took over this (successful) model... Or - better - they (Apple) are now in a position which allows them to dictate the usage of their device. That's good for the one, and not so good for the others ;-) But the good news is, that the back-end looks and performs really good and is useful, even if there is no third-party app running on it (which never was the case in the fore-mentioned scenario) :-) andy at 21.10.2007 20:52 Uhr, Kevin Darling wrote: > The only reason for raising the spectre of security for third party > apps, is if they come from unknown companies. (The real attack > vectors will come from Safari code blunders, not third party apps.) --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "iPhoneWebDev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/iphonewebdev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
