On Jan 11, 5:53 am, Mr Junk <[email protected]> wrote:
> He was verbally abusing everyone, calling people names
Everyone? The only bit that might be called abuse was:
| And of course, its proponents will all chime in that I
| hate frameworks and like wasting money. You can
| listen to morons or you can listen to me.
Which is a straw man argument. It's a sad day when that is sufficient
to get banned from a group.
> and with no
> useful solutions or help.
You didn't read the post then or are deliberately misrepresenting the
content.
> Nothing but complaints and badness about whatever he touched on.
The intention of the post was to point out why he thought iUI should
be avoided. I didn't see anyone directly address the points raised,
presumably they agree with his criticism of iUI.
> I will probably leave the group if he is reinstated.
Petulant too, good riddance. This is the most active and interesting
thread in the group for quite some time, I'd say he's done a good job.
> The noise to signal ration was far too high and I don't have time to
> keep making filters.
One post? If it upsets you, don't read his posts or follow the
thread. I don't see how it's easier to write a post asking for
someone to be banned than to kill-file them.
> On Jan 10, 2009, at 5:50 AM, RobG wrote:
I wish you would reply below trimmed quotes of what you are replying
too, it makes life a lot easier.
> > On Jan 8, 1:20 pm, Mr Junk <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> Moderator, can you shut this obnoxious jerk off
>
> > Why? If you have trouble with what was posted, respond with reasoned
> > argument. If Roger has been banned because of this post, I request
> > that his account is restored.
>
> >> , or is this list his
> >> platform to abuse anyone and everyone?
>
> > What? iUI was criticised, not anyone who replied.
>
> I and several other were called all the names in the book including
> nincompoop.
You're making things up, that is why it is important to actually quote
the text you are replying too. The OP didn't reply to any of your
posts, nor call anyone a "nincompoop" anywhere in the thread, nor was
anyone who directly responded to his post called any names by him.
Read his posts, then post the actual words used.
> This isn't about IUI but respect for others on the list.
Respect? So because you think you saw things that weren't there, you
ask for him to be banned? If you don't like the criticism of iUI,
deal with the issues raised directly, not by shooting the messenger.
--
Rob
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"iPhoneWebDev" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/iphonewebdev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
