Because to provide a sliding effect that doesn't look crunchy or buggy, you have to lock zoom to 1/1. If zooming for a few is more important than the sexy sliding for all, be my guest !
R. Le 12 oct. 2010 à 03:05, RobG <[email protected]> a écrit : > On Oct 11, 12:53 am, Remi Grumeau <[email protected]> wrote: >> Because iPhone / smartphones users are thumb pointer users. >> Again, most of them. > > If that is true (and maybe it is, but I haven't seen any research to > back it up), then users are extremely unlikely to accidentally zoom > instead of pan (I don't think they were ever likely to, even if they > aren't just using a thumb). So that's one more reason for *not* > disabling zooming. > > So far the only reason to do so is because the page author wants to > keep a precise layout on the screen, regardless of how users actually > want to use the application. So for the sake of one person's vanity, > every single user of that page can't zoom, regardless of the > additional functionality that would provide for at least some of those > users. > > And no one seems to feel this is necessary for non-mobile users, who > can zoom text and images individually, or can zoom the entire screen. > > Sorry, but I am really struggling to understand the need to remove > functionality provided for free for no substative reason. > > -- > Rob > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "iPhoneWebDev" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/iphonewebdev?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "iPhoneWebDev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/iphonewebdev?hl=en.
