On Tuesday 13 of March 2007, Carol Hebert wrote: > Hi Arkadiusz, > > I was working on building the SLES10 32- and 64-bit rpms to add to the > (excellent :-) collection of rpms some folks on the list have offered > to supply for v1.8.9 and noticed that the ./contrib stuff no longer > seems to get added to the rpm. I went back to look at the Makefile > and spec file patches you posted and noticed that it appears that your > patches intentionally bypass the contrib files for this release. I'm > sorry I didn't notice this before (although you clearly stated it in > the comments you sent with the patch)
> as there is a file in contrib > (oem_ibm_sel_map) that IBM requires. Then it should be installed in datadir/ipmitool IMO. > Given the early-release/non-general-use nature often typical of > ./contrib, I don't know what the best resolution is for this issue and > am hoping to start a discussion here. Do we want to put the contrib/* > files back in the rpms for future releases? Are there other files in > there that folks need to have in the rpms or is it only the > oem_ibm_sel_map file that's needed in which case we could probably > just move that file somewhere else? I see no point in placing contrib in binary rpm. Is anyone using anything from contrib (beside oem_ibm_sel_map) ? > Thanks, > Carol Hebert -- Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz PLD/Linux Team arekm / maven.pl http://ftp.pld-linux.org/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Ipmitool-devel mailing list Ipmitool-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ipmitool-devel
