I'm curious what Intel thinks of proprietary extensions from vendors such as Supermicro, Dell, etc. that gives a video or "KVM" transport over IPMI? I personally use Linux so the standard text "sol" transport is fine but for heavy Windows environments, you really need a GUI "console" to be able to get the job done.
--David > Holger, > > Good question, but I don't know the answer. > Perhaps someone directly involved in the planning for IPMI spec updates > can answer. > Try http://www.intel.com/design/servers/ipmi/feedback.htm > > Andy > > ________________________________ > > From: Liebig, Holger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2007 2:23 AM > To: Cress, Andrew R > Cc: ipmitool-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: RE: Re: [Ipmitool-devel] IPMI SOL failed on Intel Harwich > > > Andy, > ________________________________ > > > IPMI is for server platforms, and has tremendous momentum and > support across the industry. IPMI supports more server features than > AMT. IPMI is a strategic standard for Intel. Intel server customers > would go elsewhere if we moved from IPMI to AMT. There are no near-term > plans for an IPMI 3.0. Intel will continue to ship IPMI BMCs > indefinitely on all server platforms. > See http://telcoserv.so.intel.com/mgt/ipmifunc.htm > <http://telcoserv.so.intel.com/mgt/ipmifunc.htm> for an overview of > IPMI functions. > > [Liebig, Holger] Thanks for sharing. Are there any plans to > extend/update IPMI to IPv6? > > Thanks, > Holger > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Ipmitool-devel mailing list Ipmitool-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ipmitool-devel
