Hi, Sheesh. It turns out I can't read my own notes ;-}. What I sent for the disposition of #29 was actually supposed to be for #34:
> 29) Still looking this over. I have (unfounded right now :-} concerns > that there may be corner cases or hw that aren't taken into account. > As of right now, I'm sort of leaning toward submitting this after > 1.8.10 rolls so it can live in the cvs tree for a while and get lots of testing > before it's in a release. Please let me know if anyone has any strong > objections to this approach. What I *really* meant to say for #29 was that I think some of the SDR, SEL, etc. fixes that have been submitted recently may have fixed the problem described in #29. IMHO, let's test the proposed 1.8.10 tarball to see if the problem is already fixed before pursuing this further. Thanks and sorry for the confusion, Carol ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08 _______________________________________________ Ipmitool-devel mailing list Ipmitool-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ipmitool-devel
