On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 12:16 PM, Zdenek Styblik
<zdenek.styb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 5:13 PM, Asif Iqbal <vad...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 10:06 AM, Zdenek Styblik
>> <sty...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I hope I\'m writing to correct man. I don\'t know how to
>>> back-reply to SF.net mailing list, so I has to be done this way.
>>>
>>> I have access to x4270m2 which has ILOM 3.0.16.10 r65138,
>>> ipmitool 1.8.10.4, and I don\'t see problems you are
>>
>> your ILOM is lot higher than mine. however my ipmitool is newer.
>>
>> ILOM Version:   v3.0.9.27 r58107
>> ipmitool version 1.8.11
>>
>
> Yes, we are mostly running "bleeding edge" :) It doesn't mean I
> recommend it in production!
> As for version of ipmitool. The one I've recommended to try is
> "hacked" version from Sun, now Oracle.
> It has some "tune ups", so despite version number, I would give it a
> try. I mean, install it into virtual

I installed the one from oracle site for x4170m2. and now I get all recognized

thanks for your help

> machine or somewhere and try to query server via LAN interface. I've
> tried to dig up relevant bug
> report, because I think I've seen something, but unsuccessfully. So I
> really don't know for sure
> nor I did have time.
>
> Updating ILOM resp. firmware of your server might introduce new
> problems. If your server
> is stable, keep it that way. If this "hacked" version of ipmitool
> prints the same, well, ILOM
> then *crossed fingers*. I mean: "ye be warned!" :)
>
> Best regards,
> Zdenek Styblik
>
>> I am running ubuntu lucid. I am guessing I will need to upgrade the ILOM 
>> then.
>>
>>> referring to. If possible, try ipmitool from Hardware
>>> Management Pack before updating ILOM.
>>>
>>> I would try different ipmitool first, since changing server
>>> firmware might cause/introduce another problems. This
>>> doesn\'t mean there aren\'t bugs in IPMI stack which are
>>> beyond bogus being displayed.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Zdenek
>>>
>>> --
>>> This message has been sent to you, a registered SourceForge.net user,
>>> by another site user, through the SourceForge.net site.  This message
>>> has been delivered to your SourceForge.net mail alias.  You may reply
>>> to this message using the "Reply" feature of your email client, or
>>> using the messaging facility of SourceForge.net at:
>>> https://sourceforge.net/sendmessage.php?touser=2161652
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Asif Iqbal
>> PGP Key: 0xE62693C5 KeyServer: pgp.mit.edu
>> A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
>> Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
>>
>



-- 
Asif Iqbal
PGP Key: 0xE62693C5 KeyServer: pgp.mit.edu
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a
definitive record of customers, application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy1
_______________________________________________
Ipmitool-devel mailing list
Ipmitool-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ipmitool-devel

Reply via email to