On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 3:12 PM, Zdenek Styblik <zdenek.styb...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 8:03 PM, Dan Gora <d...@adax.com> wrote: > [...] >> >> I agree, but I think that it's better to fix the warnings if at all >> possible. Of course adding -Werror would force people to deal with >> their warnings. >> > > Dan, > > does it mean to deal with warnings/"errors" left by "others" as well?
Well if you want it to compile cleanly without warnings, that's pretty much the only way to do it, regardless of who's responsible. > If so ... yeah, I'd be realistic about this one. Yeah I agree.. I don't have any problem with the odd warning here and there, especially since gcc changes what it warns about in some versions (comparing signed and unsigned chars for example). > In other words, I despite I agree, I don't think it's going to fly. > :-/ Same for clean compilation - somewhat wishful thinking. Just check > the tracker and never ending queue of tickets. I agree, but removing -Wno-unused-return doesn't add any new warnings that I can see. If it does, then I'll fix it, but I didn't see any. thanks d ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Own the Future-Intel® Level Up Game Demo Contest 2013 Rise to greatness in Intel's independent game demo contest. Compete for recognition, cash, and the chance to get your game on Steam. $5K grand prize plus 10 genre and skill prizes. Submit your demo by 6/6/13. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel_levelupd2d _______________________________________________ Ipmitool-devel mailing list Ipmitool-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ipmitool-devel
