> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > (it is a bit twisted, I admit) Too many of these "twists" in specification is worrysome. I can go with the "swap" specification, but it still feels itchy to read "get destination options", but hey, remember you are not getting the true original destination options, but a twisted version ... But, as I have not been involved implementing that thing, it is just the feeling, no serious objection from me. I assume other people know what they do. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
- Re: rfc2292bis: interaction with home address opti... Steve Deering
- Re: rfc2292bis: interaction with home address option Francis Dupont
- Re: rfc2292bis: interaction with home address option Erik Nordmark
- Re: rfc2292bis: interaction with home address option Francis Dupont
- RE: rfc2292bis: interaction with home address option Richard Draves
- RE: rfc2292bis: interaction with home address option Steve Deering
- Re: rfc2292bis: interaction with home address option Francis Dupont
- Re: rfc2292bis: interaction with home address opti... Erik Nordmark
- Re: rfc2292bis: interaction with home address ... itojun
- Re: rfc2292bis: interaction with home addr... Markku Savela
- Re: rfc2292bis: interaction with home address ... Francis Dupont
- RE: rfc2292bis: interaction with home address option Richard Draves
- RE: rfc2292bis: interaction with home address option Richard Draves
- RE: rfc2292bis: interaction with home address option Steve Deering
- Re: rfc2292bis: interaction with home address option Jim Bound
- Re: rfc2292bis: interaction with home address option Francis Dupont
- RE: rfc2292bis: interaction with home address option Richard Draves
